ArticleThe bone & joint journal2022
Developing a minimum common dataset for hip fracture audit to help countries set up national audits that can support international comparisons.
Article in The bone & joint journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma in acute care settings: a systematic review.European geriatric medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Epidemiology, patient outcome and complications after non-operative management of hip fracture: a systematic review.Anaesthesia · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term outcome collection after hip fracture in Ireland: a systematic review of traditional and grey literature.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023Pooled it
- Position paper: a coordinated approach to fracture and fall prevention from seven international organizations.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Nordic hip fracture registries: comparisons toward a minimal common and standardized Nordic Hip Fracture Dataset (Nordic-HFD).Acta orthopaedica · 2026Article
- Fracture laterality as an independent prognostic factor for clinical outcomes after hip fracture surgery : an analysis of 72,008 patients.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- The development and evolution of the Irish Hip Fracture Database: a quality care initiative 2013-2024.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Proof-of-concept study for a national geriatric hip fracture registry in Brazil.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Article
- Perspective: Fragility Fracture Network in the Nordic Orthopaedic Federations countries - the role of orthopaedic surgeons.Acta orthopaedica · 2026Article
- Delirium and cognitive assessment in national hip fracture registries: a scoping review.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- The state of orthopaedic trauma-related registries in Latin America: benefits, barriers, and bearings.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025Review
- Benefits of an advanced nurse practitioner led hip fracture clinic in an Irish Orthopaedic Trauma Service.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Article
- Pre-fracture functional status and 30-day recovery predict 5-year survival in patients with hip fracture: findings from a prospective real-world study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Observational
- Weight-bearing and mobilisation timing after hip fracture surgery in older adults: an international survey of clinicians' perspectives.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Association between early sitting and functional mobility recovery after hip-fracture surgery in older patients: a prospective cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Effect of Nationwide Postoperative Rehabilitation at Home Program after Lower Extremity Surgeries in Older and Younger People.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2025Article
- Preoperative Anaemia Increases the Likelihood of 1-Year Mortality After Hip Fracture.Advances in orthopedics · 2025Article
- The use of minimum common data set in the development of the Greek Fragility Hip Fracture Registry in the Greek health care setting: the first year of its pilot implementation.Archives of osteoporosis · 2024Article
- Barriers and facilitators to early mobilisation and weight-bearing as tolerated after hip fracture surgery among older adults in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study.Age and ageing · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe aim of this study was to explore current use of the Global Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) Minimum Common Dataset (MCD) within established national hip fracture registries, and to propose a revised MCD to enable international benchmarking for hip fracture care.
methodsWe compared all ten established national hip fracture registries: England, Wales, and Northern Ireland; Scotland; Australia and New Zealand; Republic of Ireland; Germany; the Netherlands; Sweden; Norway; Denmark; and Spain. We tabulated all questions included in each registry, and cross-referenced them against the 32 questions of the MCD dataset. Having identified those questions consistently used in the majority of national audits, and which additional fields were used less commonly, we then used consensus methods to establish a revised MCD.
resultsA total of 215 unique questions were used across the ten registries. Only 72 (34%) were used in more than one national audit, and only 32 (15%) by more than half of audits. Only one registry used all 32 questions from the 2014 MCD, and five questions were only collected by a single registry. Only 21 of the 32 questions in the MCD were used in the majority of national audits. Only three fields (anaesthetic grade, operation, and date/time of surgery) were used by all ten established audits. We presented these findings at the Asia-Pacific FFN meeting, and used an online questionnaire to capture feedback from expert clinicians from different countries. A draft revision of the MCD was then presented to all 95 nations represented at the Global FFN conference in September 2021, with online feedback again used to finalize the revised MCD.
conclusionThe revised MCD will help aspirant nations establish new registry programmes, facilitate the integration of novel analytic techniques and greater multinational collaboration, and serve as an internationally-accepted standard for monitoring and improving hip fracture services. Cite this article:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.