ReviewJournal of orthopaedics
Prevalence of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis in people not seeking care: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Swedish trends in excision arthroplasty of the acromioclavicular joint during 2008-2023: a population-based register study.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic Bone Block Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability with Subcritical Glenohumeral Bone Loss.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Radiographic osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ OA) is a common incidental finding and an uncommon reason for people to seek care for shoulder symptoms. We reviewed the published evidence regarding the age-specific prevalence of ACJ OA to establish the base rate of pathophysiology. Methods: A total of 10 studies including 1831 shoulders met our criteria. A pooled analysis was done to obtain a proportion of subjects with ACJ OA across age categories. Results: Forty-eight percent of 953 cadaver and skeletal specimens and 70% of 210 MRI images of asymptomatic shoulders were found to have changes consistent with ACJ OA. Four studies reporting age as a continuous variable found a statistically significant association between older age and prevalence of ACJ OA. Conclusions: The observation that ACJ OA is highly prevalent as humans age establishes a very high base rate of what one can infer is well-accommodated disease. Given that a high base rate of incidental disease creates a low pre-test odds that radiological findings of disease correspond with symptoms, diagnosis of symptomatic ACJ OA is subject to substantial inaccuracy and should be made sparingly, mindful of the potential harms of a diagnosis that can lead to an ablative surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.