Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35638090›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2022

Feasibility and Optimal Time Point of [

Nicolai Huebner, Sazan Rasul, Pascal Baltzer, Paola Clauser, Karl Hermann Grubmüller, Markus Mitterhauser, Marcus Hacker, Axel Heidenreich, Pawel Rajwa, Harun Fajkovic and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 6 countries.

Nicolai HuebnerDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sazan RasulDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Pascal BaltzerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Paola ClauserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karl Hermann GrubmüllerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.
Markus MitterhauserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marcus HackerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Axel HeidenreichDepartment of urology, Uro-oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Pawel RajwaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Harun FajkovicDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard GrubmüllerDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences · ATUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted molecular imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) has significantly improved the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (PCA). Objective: To assess the feasibility and compare the diagnostic accuracy of [ Design setting and participants: We identified 20 patients in our prospectively maintained database with primary oligometastatic PCA who underwent cytoreductive radical prostatectomy and superextended pelvic lymph node dissection after systemic therapy, who had baseline and preoperative [ Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We performed a region-based analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of imaging, using pathology as a reference. Regions were predefined as prostate, internal iliac left/right, obturator left/right, external iliac left/right, common iliac left/right, and presacral. Results and limitations: Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and diagnostic effectiveness were, respectively, 95.65%, 78.22%, 98.39%, 57.89%, and 83.00% for baseline [ Conclusions: Baseline imaging, [ Patient summary: We found that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) imaging used early, before hormonal therapy or chemotherapy, provides more accurate information about the spread of the disease, than if used immediately before surgery but after hormonal therapy or chemotherapy. Early use of PSMA-PET has the potential to improve therapy also at later stages of the disease.

Indexed as

Cytoreductive surgeryHormone therapyProstate cancerProstate-specific membrane antigenRadical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID35638090
PMCPMC9142741
OpenAlexW4229014299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.