Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35638087›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2022

Survival and Long-term Effects of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy on Kidney Function in Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Nora Hendriks, Joyce Baard, Harrie P Beerlage, Barbara M A Schout, Klara S G Doherty, Rob C M Pelger, Guido M Kamphuis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07077447 (DaBlaCa 23 - The European Collaborative Study on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07077447 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

DaBlaCa 23 - The European Collaborative Study on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

TypeobservationalSponsorZealand University HospitalRan2025 to 2040Enrolled2,500ConditionsUpper Urinary Tract Urothelial CarcinomaArmsKidney sparing surgery for high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nora HendriksDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joyce BaardDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Harrie P BeerlageDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Barbara M A SchoutDepartment of Urology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
Klara S G DohertyDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rob C M PelgerDepartment of Urology, Leids UMC, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Guido M KamphuisDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAlrijne Ziekenhuis · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines discriminate between high- and low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) to determine treatment by means of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) or kidney-sparing surgery (KSS). Objective: To compare long-term oncological outcomes and renal function for patients with UTUC treated by RNU versus KSS. Design setting and participants: A retrospective cohort study, including 186 renal units with nonmetastatic UTUC treated in a tertiary referral centre between 2010 and 2021, was conducted. Intervention: RNU, ureterorenoscopy, percutaneous tumour resection, and segmental ureteral resection. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and renal function were analysed by means of the log-rank test and the independent-sample Results and limitations: OS was 71.1% for the RNU group and 81.9% for the KSS group. In a cohort matched for propensity weight based on EAU risk stratification progression-free survival (PFS; RNU 96.0%; KSS 86.0%), MFS (RNU 72.0%; KSS 84.0%), CSS (RNU 84.0%; KSS 86.0%), and OS (RNU 76.0%; KSS 76.0%) were all similar between both groups. No significant differences in renal function were seen at 2 and 5 yr after the intervention. Although this series represents the largest cohort of (high-risk) UTUC patients treated by means of KSS to date, it is not suitable for performing a multivariate analysis. Conclusions: PFS, MFS, CSS, and OS were all comparable when analysing the RNU and KSS groups. Similar results for groups with evenly distributed risk factors and a large percentage of high-risk disease suggest that current risk stratification might not be accurate in discriminating low-risk from high-risk disease. Patient summary: In this report, we looked at outcomes for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in a specialised hospital. We conclude that kidney-sparing surgery and radical nephroureterectomy have comparable outcomes and that risk factors for worse outcome might not be identified correctly.

Indexed as

Kidney-sparing surgeryRadical nephroureterectomyUpper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35638087
PMCPMC9142752
OpenAlexW4225297839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.