ArticleEuropean urology open science2022
Cost Effectiveness of the Use of Prophylactic Mesh To Prevent Parastomal Hernia After Urinary Diversion with an Ileal Conduit.
Article in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parastomal Hernia: direct repair versus relocation: is stoma relocation worth the risk? A comparative meta-analysis and systematic review.Updates in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Use of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia formation: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Umbrella review of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of using mesh in the prevention of parastomal hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia in urological surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Preventing Parastomal Hernias After Radical Cystectomy with Ileal Conduit: A Systematic Review Regarding Surgical Prophylactic Techniques.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Preventing parastomal hernia following radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion: outcomes of prophylactic mesh reinforcement.Central European journal of urology · 2026Article
- Prevention of parastomal hernia after ileal conduit using prophylactic mesh: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Arab journal of urology · 2026Review
- Propensity Score Analysis of the Utility of Supervised Perioperative Abdominal Wall Exercises for the Prevention of Parastomal Hernia.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Repair of parastomal hernia after Bricker procedure: retrospective consecutive experience of a tertiary center.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of (accelerated) pre-operative versus (conventional) post-operative radiotherapy for patients with oral cavity cancer in Sweden.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Article
- Early postoperative outcomes of intraperitoneal funnel mesh for parastomal hernia prevention in robotic radical cystectomy: A retrospective feasibility study.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prophylactic lightweight mesh in the sublay position reduced the cumulative incidence of parastomal hernia (PSH) after cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion in a randomised controlled trial. Objective: To investigate whether the use of prophylactic mesh is cost-effective in comparison to no mesh from the health care provider perspective. Design setting and participants: Data on health care resource utilisation (outpatient care and inpatient care) were obtained for 159 patients included in a randomised trial. The patients underwent surgery at Skåne University Hospital or Helsingborg County Hospital (80 with a prophylactic mesh and 79 without) and information about care was ascertained from the regional health care register. The patients underwent surgery between 2012 and 2017 and were followed until death or August 2020. Outcome measurements and statistical analyses: The primary outcome measure was the clinical incidence of PSH. Costs are reported in Euro in 2020 prices (€1 = 10.486 Swedish Krona) and presented as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with confidence intervals (CIs) calculated using a nonparametric bootstrap procedure. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were performed to capture the uncertainty for ICERs. Results and limitations: The mean difference in total costs between the mesh and no-mesh groups was -€2047 (95% CI -€16 441 to €12 348). Seventeen patients (21.5%) in the no-mesh group developed clinical PSH versus six patients (7.5%) in the mesh group ( Conclusions: The use of prophylactic mesh during ileal conduit reconstruction to prevent PSH is cost-effective from the health care provider perspective. Patient summary: In patients having their bladder surgically removed, a mesh implant can be inserted when a portion of the intestine is used to create an opening to drain urine from the body. Our results show that mesh use to prevent development of a hernia at the opening where urine exits the body is cost-effective from the perspective of health care providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.