Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35638061›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Ex-vivo evaluation of miniaturized probes for endoscopic optical coherence tomography in urothelial cancer diagnostics.

Dominik Stefan Schoeb, Carolin Wollensak, Simon Kretschmer, Gerardo González-Cerdas, Caglar Ataman, Gian Kayser, Franz Friedrich Dressler, Christian Gratzke, Hans Zappe, Arkadiusz Miernik

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dominik Stefan SchoebMedical Center - University of Freiburg (institution to which this work is attributed), Department of Urology, Hugstetterstr. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Carolin WollensakMedical Center - University of Freiburg (institution to which this work is attributed), Department of Urology, Hugstetterstr. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Simon KretschmerGisela and Erwin Sick Chair of Micro-optics, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Gerardo González-CerdasGisela and Erwin Sick Chair of Micro-optics, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Caglar AtamanGisela and Erwin Sick Chair of Micro-optics, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Gian KayserInstitute of Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 115a, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Franz Friedrich DresslerUniversity Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Luebeck Site, Institute of Pathology, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Luebeck, Germany.
Christian GratzkeMedical Center - University of Freiburg (institution to which this work is attributed), Department of Urology, Hugstetterstr. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Hans ZappeGisela and Erwin Sick Chair of Micro-optics, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Arkadiusz MiernikMedical Center - University of Freiburg (institution to which this work is attributed), Department of Urology, Hugstetterstr. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The gold standard for detecting bladder cancer is white light cystoscopy (WLC) and resection of suspicious lesions. In this study, we evaluate two miniaturized Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) probes for endoscopic use, regarding their applicability in diagnosing urothelial cancer. Materials and methods: In total, 33 patients who underwent a radical cystectomy were included. Preoperative oncological staging and determining the indication for the surgical intervention were done following the latest European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. Samples were taken from bladder tissue after bladder removal and prepared for OCT measurement. Additionally, porcine bladder samples were used as reference tissue. We took measurements using two miniaturized probes: a bimodal probe and a single modality OCT probe. A non-miniaturized standard OCT scanner was used as a reference. Results: Histopathological examination revealed urothelial cancer in all but three patients. Measurements on porcine tissue revealed a clear distinction between the urothelial layers for all probes. Furthermore, we detected improved image quality thanks to the stretching of the tissue. We took 271 measurements in human samples. While the urothelial layers were well delineated in healthy tissue, all the probes revealed a loss of these structures in cancerous regions. While the single-modality probe delivered an image quality equaling the reference images, it was possible to detect cancerous areas with the bimodal probe. Conclusion: We demonstrate that endoscopic probes for OCT imaging are technologically feasible and deliver acceptable image quality. A distinction between healthy and abnormal tissue is possible. We propose combining different endoscopic imaging modalities as a promising approach for urothelial cancer diagnostics.

Indexed as

Diagnostic techniques and proceduresEndoscopyOptical coherenceTomographyUrinary bladder neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35638061
PMCPMC9142382
OpenAlexW4225538643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.