ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Type, management, and associated factors of failed spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Prospective cohort study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contributors to failed spinal anesthesia.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Incidence and predictors of failed spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Patient safety in surgery · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Incidence and factors associated with failed spinal anaesthesia among patients undergoing surgery: a multi- center prospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal anesthesia is an anesthesia technique suitable for cesarean section to avoid respiratory complications. However, the management of spinal anesthesia is very important because spinal anesthesia may fail and the patient may be exposed to pain and discomfort. Objective: To assess the type, management, and related factors of failure of spinal anesthesia at cesarean section. Methods: Multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted at a public hospital in Addis Ababa on 794 mothers who met the criteria for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Data collection methods were adopted, including chart reviews and observations of spinal anesthesia procedures. The data collected was entered in Epi info version 7 and analyzed in SPSS version 20. Independent variables with dependent variables were analyzed using logistic regression. A p-value of 0.05 for & it; was considered a statistically significant test cutoff. Result: Of 121 failed spinal anesthesia 35 were complete and 86 were partial failed spinal anesthesia from those complete failed spinal anesthesia were managed by repeating spinal and converting to general anesthesia and partial failed spinal anesthesia were managed by the supplementary drug. Experience of the anesthetist <1 (AOR = 4.12, 95% CI, 2.47-6.90), patient position (AOR = 14.43,95%CL, 2.65-78.61), number of attempts>1 (AOR = 9.26, 95% CI, 5.69-15.01), bloody CSF (AOR = 6.37, 95%CI, 2.90-13.96), BMI ≥30kgm2 (AOR = 2.03, 95%CI, 1.12-3.68) and dose of bupivacaine <10 mg (AOR = 2.72, 95% CI, 1.33-5.53) were found to be statistically significant associated with failed spinal anesthesia. Conclusion and recommendation: Experience of anesthetists (<1 year), obesity, bupivacaine dose <10 mg, bloody appearance of CSF, number of attempts> 1 were associated factors for failed spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Our failed spinal management is not the same among hospitals and does not follow recommended failed spinal management. Up-skilling of anesthesia professionals should be considered on identified associated factors of failed spinal anesthesia and management of failed spinal anesthesia should be based on the recommended guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.