ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Predictive risk factors for venous thromboembolism in neurosurgical patients: A retrospective analysis single center cohort study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes following a hospital-wide transition from enoxaparin to tinzaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in neurosurgical patients.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Retrospective analysis of the effectiveness and safety of sulodexide for venous thromboembolism prevention in neurosurgical patients.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Three-Month Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Who Underwent Neurological Surgeries.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Determining prediction factors of post-neurosurgical thrombosis requires consideration of the entire spectrum of risk factors.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has a major effect on morbidity and mortality in neurosurgical patients. However, identifying risk factors that may be useful in practice is a challenge. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence and determine the predictors of VTE in patients undergoing neurosurgery. Materials and methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted on adult patients admitted to a private hospital for a primary elective neurosurgical procedure between January 2015 and December 2020. Univariate analysis was used to examine clinical factors, and multivariable regression analysis was used to identify predictors of VTE. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve demonstrated the fitting model and discrimination power. Results: A total of 350 patients who underwent neurological surgery were identified. There were 26 patients (7.4%) with VTE. The final predictors were found to be statistically significant in the multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, including non-Asian populations (p value < 0.001, odds ratio [OR]: 6.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.20-16.89), lack of postoperative ambulation (p value = 0.009, OR: 9.25, 95% CI = 1.17-48.83), and septic shock complication (p value = 0.001, OR: 5.36, 95% CI = 1.46-19.62). The AUROC was 0.708 (95% CI 0.61-0.80). Conclusion: Although the incidence of VTE in patients receiving neurosurgery is minimal, it is also higher in non-Asian patients, those who lack of postoperative ambulation, and patients with septic shock complications. This approach may be useful to predict thromboembolism in neurosurgical patients. External validation of the prognostic model requires more investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.