ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics of cleidocranial dysplasia: A systematic review of cases reported in south America.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis, treatment, and management recommendations for cleidocranial dysplasia: A modified Delphi panel.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026Article
- Factors associated with single versus multiple supernumerary teeth in a paediatric population: a cross-sectional study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Article
- The Impact of Genetics on Craniofacial Dysplasias and Consequent Oral Malformations-Integrative Review.Genes · 2026Review
- Cleidocranial dysplasia with preserved function under conservative management: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Two-generation Cleidocranial Dysplasia Involving Three Individuals of a Family: A Rare Case Report.Contemporary clinical dentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare disease characterized by craniofacial, skeletal, and oral anomalies. The disease prevalence is estimated to be 1 per million inhabitants; thus, only a few studies have described large cohorts of CCD patients. This study reviewed the clinical-radiological and demographic characteristics of patients with CCD in South America. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of all cases of CCD reported in South America following the PRISMA guidelines. Demographic information (sex, age at diagnosis, origin, reason for consultation, and family history) was also recorded. CCD signs were divided into "craniofacial" and "skeletal" categories. Results: A total of 72 cases were included. We found that oral anomalies were the most common reason for consultation leading to a diagnosis in patients, with a median age at diagnosis of 14 years. Fifty percent of the patients were women. Open fontanels or cranial sutures, the presence of at least one of the typical CCD facies (frontal bossing, brachycephaly, hypertelorism, or depression of the nasal bridge), and supernumerary teeth were reported in 92%, 85%, and 88% of cases, respectively. Clavicular dysplasia was present in 98.6% of cases, and other skeletal abnormalities such as scoliosis, pubic symphysis diastasis, and flat feet were found; short stature was present in 71% of cases, and one case presented cognitive deficits. Conclusion: Although the phenotypic spectrum of CCD is variable, clavicular dysplasia, open fontanels or cranial sutures, dental anomalies, and at least one of the typical CCD facies are present in at least 80% of cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.