Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35638006›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Nipple aspirate fluid and its use for the early detection of breast cancer.

Natasha Jiwa, Ahmed Ezzat, Josephine Holt, Dhuleep S Wijayatilake, Zoltan Takats, Daniel Richard Leff

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha JiwaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, St Marys Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Ahmed EzzatDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, St Marys Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Josephine HoltRoyal Free NHS Trust, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
Dhuleep S WijayatilakeQueens Hospital, Romford, Essex, RM7 0AG, UK.
Zoltan TakatsImperial College London, South Kensington, Campus Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Daniel Richard LeffDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, St Marys Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.
St Mary's Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBQueen's Hospital · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nipple aspirate fluid is the physiological biofluid lining ductal epithelial cells. Historically, cytology of nipple fluid has been the gold standard diagnostic method for assessment of ductal fluid in patients with symptomatic nipple discharge. The role of biomarker discovery in nipple aspirate fluid for assessment of asymptomatic and high-risk patients is highly attractive but evaluation to date is limited by poor diagnostic accuracy. However, the emergence of new technologies capable of identifying metabolites that have been previously thought unidentifiable within such small volumes of fluid, has enabled testing of nipple biofluid to be re-examined. This review evaluates the use of new technologies to evaluate the components of nipple fluid and their potential to serve as biomarkers in screening.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBreast cancerEarly detectionMass spectrometryMetabolomicsNipple aspirate fluid

Identifiers

PMID35638006
PMCPMC9142541
OpenAlexW4224288223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.