Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35637981›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 years old and younger: Structural valve deterioration at long-term follow-up. Retrospective study.

Silvia Corona, Sabrina Manganiello, Mauro Pepi, Gloria Tamborini, Manuela Muratori, Sarah Ghulam Ali, Nicolò Capra, Moreno Naliato, Francesco Alamanni, Marco Zanobini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Long-term age-stratified outcomes after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a Dutch cohort study.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Silvia CoronaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Sabrina ManganielloDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Mauro PepiDepartment of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Gloria TamboriniDepartment of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Manuela MuratoriDepartment of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Sarah Ghulam AliDepartment of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Nicolò CapraDepartment of Biostatistics, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Moreno NaliatoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Francesco AlamanniDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Marco ZanobiniDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Structural valve deterioration (SVD) remains the major determinant of bioprosthesis durability. The aim of this study was to investigate the SVD incidence, predictors and outcomes in patients aged 50 years and younger after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (bAVR). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 73 consecutive patients ≤50 years old who underwent bioprosthetic AVR at our center between 2005 and 2015. Median age at surgery was 44 (interquartile range [IQR]: 39-47) years. Follow-up was 93.2% complete at a median time of 7.2 (IQR: 5.5-9.5) years. Cumulative follow-up was 545.5 valve-years. Bioprosthesis SVD was determined by strict echocardiographic assessment. Results: The overall survival-rate at 10/15 years and freedom from SVD at 10/12.5 years were 89.6 ± 5.2%/81.5 ± 9.1% and 73.5 ± 8.2%/41.9 ± 18.9%, respectively. SVD occurred at a median time of 8.2 (IQR: 6.0-9.9) years after bAVR. Age was not found as an independent predictor for SVD at the multivariable model, despite a higher rate of SVD in the age group ≤30 years. Freedom from reoperation due to SVD at 10/15 years was 71.3 ± 14.1%/13.6 ± 12.3%. Reoperation was performed at a median time of 10.0 (IQR: 8.9-11.9) years since first bAVR and was associated with a 100% 12-month survival. Conclusions: In our study, the rate and time of SVD occurrence were comparable to those of other studies' older age groups. Strict echocardiographic monitoring of valve performance is mandatory to set the appropriate timing of eventual reoperation. This attitude can improve outcomes of bAVR in younger patients.

Indexed as

Aortic valve replacementAVR, Aortic Valve ReplacementbAVR, bioprosthetic Aortic Valve ReplacementBioprosthesisEF, Ejection FractionLV, Left VentricleNYHA, New York Heart AssociationPASP, Pulmonary Artery Systolic PressurePPM, Prosthesis-Patient MismatchReoperationStructural valve deteriorationSVD, Structural Valve DeteriorationTAVR, Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTTE, Transthoracic Echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID35637981
PMCPMC9142659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.