Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35637909›Full record

ArticleCell reports methods2022

DIPA-CRISPR is a simple and accessible method for insect gene editing.

Yu Shirai, Maria-Dolors Piulachs, Xavier Belles, Takaaki Daimon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Infectious transgenesis in arthropods.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Oogenesis of the German Cockroach: From Morphology to Regulation.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Spider Eye Development Editing and Silk Fiber Engineering Using CRISPR-Cas.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  15. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Knockout of the White Gene inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu ShiraiGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
Maria-Dolors PiulachsInstitute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
Xavier BellesInstitute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
Takaaki DaimonGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current approaches for insect gene editing require microinjection of materials into early embryos. This severely limits the application of gene editing to a great number of insect species, especially to those whose reproduction systems preclude access to early embryos for injection. To overcome these limitations, we report a simple and accessible method for insect gene editing, termed "direct parental" CRISPR (DIPA-CRISPR). We show that injection of Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) into the haemocoel of adult females efficiently introduces heritable mutations in developing oocytes. Importantly, commercially available standard Cas9 protein can be directly used for DIPA-CRISPR, which makes this approach highly practical and feasible. DIPA-CRISPR enables highly efficient gene editing in the cockroaches, on which conventional approaches cannot be applied, and in the model beetle

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingAnimalsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9FemaleInsectaQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9diisopropylamine dichloroacetateQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsbeetlescockroachesCRISPR-Cas9DIPA-CRISPRgene editinggenome editing

Identifiers

PMID35637909
PMCPMC9142683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.