Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35637900›Full record

ArticleGlobal implementation research and applications2022

Barriers and Facilitators for Conducting Implementation Science in German-Speaking Countries: Findings from the Promote ImpSci Interview Study.

Marie-Therese Schultes, Monika Finsterwald, Thekla Brunkert, Christina Kien, Lisa Pfadenhauer, Bianca Albers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global implementation research and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marie-Therese SchultesInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 84, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1593-3247
Monika FinsterwaldInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 84, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
Thekla BrunkertNursing Science (INS), Department Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0369-1826
Christina KienDepartment for Evidence-Based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Lisa PfadenhauerChair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5038-8072
Bianca AlbersInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 84, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9555-0547

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On a global scale, implementation science has developed considerably as a discipline in recent years. In German-speaking countries, the field has been gaining significance as well, but respective efforts in building capacity and advancing the research infrastructure are still rare. The present study investigates barriers and facilitators for conducting implementation science in German-speaking countries with the goal of formulating recommendations for creating a more supportive research infrastructure. We conducted an interview study with nine well-established implementation researchers affiliated with universities in Austria, Germany, or Switzerland. The interviews were held via Zoom or phone in November and December 2020, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Barriers that relate to characteristics of the discipline were difficulties in building a common understanding of the field and the complexity of implementation research projects. Although supportive scientific networks were important facilitators, interviewees mentioned challenges in connecting with likeminded researchers. A further barrier was the lack of opportunities for education and training in implementation science, especially in the German language. Also, participants reported a missing readiness in academia for establishing implementation science that should be addressed by advocacy of the discipline toward academic decision makers. Moreover, since most national funding agencies prioritize basic research over applied research, some interviewees named flexibility in handling research funds as a facilitator for implementation research. The results inform an agenda for promoting implementation science in German-speaking countries and can be beneficial to other countries that are currently advancing their implementation research capacity and infrastructure. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-022-00046-3.

Indexed as

Capacity buildingImplementation scienceResearch fundingResearch infrastructureScientific networksTraining

Identifiers

PMID35637900
PMCPMC9134978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.