Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35637896›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Cervical cancer screening guidelines and screening practices in 11 countries: A systematic literature review.

Wei Wang, Emanuele Arcà, Anushua Sinha, Kristina Hartl, Natalie Houwing, Smita Kothari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Human papillomavirus infection and screening strategies.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Towards the elimination of infectious HPV: exploiting CRISPR/Cas innovations.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei WangMerck Sharp & Dohme Corp., United States.
Emanuele ArcàOPEN Health, Netherlands.
Anushua SinhaMerck Sharp & Dohme Corp., United States.
Kristina HartlOPEN Health, Germany.
Natalie HouwingOPEN Health, Netherlands.
Smita KothariMerck Sharp & Dohme Corp., United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) advocates population-based screening programs to reduce the global incidence of cervical cancer. However, screening guidelines and practice continually change to reflect scientific developments. Here we describe and compare cervical cancer screening guidelines and clinical practice in 11 countries across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) complemented by a targeted literature review (TLR) to identify relevant peer-reviewed publications and policy documents, which include 120 publications, of which 86 were identified from the SLR and 34 from the TLR. Only six of 11 countries assessed have population-based screening programs in place. Considerable differences persist across countries' screening guidelines, even among comparable systems. Moreover, methods of data collection are also heterogenous, and systematic data collection is often not established. As future changes in screening guidelines and clinical practice occur (e.g., when the first cohorts of women vaccinated against HPV reach screening age), systematic collection of screening data is essential to monitor and improve screening performance.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerClinical practiceGuidelineshpvScreening

Identifiers

PMID35637896
PMCPMC9142642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.