ReviewCureus2022
Impact of Voice Therapy on Pediatric Patients With Dysphonia and Vocal Nodules: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Instrumental Voice Evaluation in Children: What Are We Getting?American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Observational
- [Clinical analysis of 102 cases of pediatric vocal fold nodules].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most prevalent pediatric ailments around the world is voice disorders. Around 5-million children suffer from voice disorders, and three out of five of them suffer from vocal nodule-induced persistent dysphonia. Nineteen out of 20 otolaryngologists recommend voice therapies for the treatment of pediatric vocal fold nodules. However, the benefits of these therapies still remain to be assessed systematically. The objective of this study is to systematically review the impact of voice therapy (direct and indirect) on pediatric patients with vocal nodules. In this systematic review of randomized control trials (RCTs), four electronic databases, PubMed, CENTRAL (Cochrane), Science Direct, and Lancet, were explored for the literature survey. The impact of direct and indirect voice therapies on pediatric cases with vocal nodules was reviewed based on the results of the selected articles. Based on stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, six articles were selected. All these studies examined the effects of direct and indirect voice therapies on two types of voice disorders, that is, dysphonia and vocal nodules. Only one of the six studies reported significant alleviation of the patient condition post-intervention. However, none of the studies discussed the clinical significance of the interventions. Three of the six included studies used both direct and indirect voice therapies and reported substantial differences in the data collected before and after the interventions. However, overall, the studies reported more significant improvements in patient conditions. More studies in this domain are still warranted, especially to help understand and define the meaning of the term "effectiveness" with respect to voice therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.