ArticleNature and science of sleep2022
Sleep Stage Classification Based on Multi-Centers: Comparison Between Different Ages, Mental Health Conditions and Acquisition Devices.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A two-branch trade-off neural network for balanced scoring sleep stages on multiple cohorts.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the general sleep stage classification performance of deep learning networks, three datasets, across different age groups, mental health conditions, and acquisition devices, comprising adults (SHHS) and children without mental health conditions (CCSHS), and subjects with mental health conditions (XJ), were included in this study. Methods: A long short-term memory (LSTM) network was used to evaluate the effect of different ages, mental health conditions, and acquisition devices on the sleep stage classification performance and the general performance. Results: Results showed that the age and different mental health conditions may affect the sleep stage classification performance of the network. The same acquisition device using different parameters may not have an obvious effect on the classification performance. When using a single dataset and two datasets for training, the network performed better only on the training dataset. When training was conducted with three datasets, the network performed well for all datasets with a Cohen's Kappa of 0.8192 and 0.8472 for the SHHS and CCSHS, respectively, but performed relatively worse (0.6491) for the XJ, which indicated the complexity effect of different mental health conditions on the sleep stage classification task. Moreover, the performance of the network trained using three datasets was similar for each dataset to that of the network trained using a single dataset and tested on the same dataset. Conclusion: These results suggested that when more datasets across different age groups, mental health conditions, and acquisition devices (ie, more datasets with different feature distributions for each sleep stage) are used for training, the general performance of a deep learning network will be superior for sleep stage classification tasks with varied conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.