ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2022
Examining Skin Recovery After a 3% Aqueous Hydrogen Peroxide (H
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Topical Probiotic Hydrogels for Burn Wound Healing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Examining Skin Recovery After a 3% Aqueous Hydrogen Peroxide (HClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Since its complete mapping, the human skin microbiome has become an important area of research related to skin health. The human skin is populated by an environment of microorganisms, fungi, insects, and viruses that is collectively known as the microbiota, and the complete genomic contribution to the skin is called the microbiome. The terms are different but frequently used interchangeably. Measuring the skin's microbial diversity can be done, but it is a sophisticated technique that is performed using expensive instruments that can sequence the 16S ribosomal RNA of the microorganisms. Finding more rapid and less costly methods to analyze the changes in the skin's microbial biome is desirable. Methods: A study was conducted on thirty (30) inner volar forearms to see if ATP biofluorescence could be employed to examine skin microbial dysbiosis caused by the application of 3% hydrogen peroxide. Fifteen individuals were examined on both arms for a total of thirty inner volar forearms using a Charm Science Results: It was found that surface treatment of the skin with three cotton swab applications of 3% hydrogen peroxide five minutes apart was able to statistically significantly suppress the expression of ATP biofluorescence compared against un-swabbed sites and the effects remained significant for six hours following the H Discussion: Using ATP biofluorescence to detect possible sanitizer-induced microbial dysbiosis may be a rapid way to examine how skin treatments may impact the return of microbially disrupted skin to its normal state and how surface treatments may impact the rate of return to normal after a disruptive event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.