Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35637744›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale2022

Methicillin-Resistant

Dharm Raj Bhatta, Sumnima Koirala, Abha Baral, Niroj Man Amatya, Sulochana Parajuli, Rajani Shrestha, Deependra Hamal, Niranjan Nayak, Shishir Gokhale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unveiling Hidden Threats: Bacterial Contamination of Frequently Touched Objects and the Biofilm Property ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dharm Raj BhattaDepartment of Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-5076
Sumnima KoiralaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Nobel College, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Abha BaralDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Nobel College, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Niroj Man AmatyaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Nobel College, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3398-7422
Sulochana ParajuliDepartment of Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Rajani ShresthaDepartment of Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Deependra HamalDepartment of Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8228-485X
Niranjan NayakDepartment of Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Shishir GokhaleDepartment of Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Manipal College of Medical Sciences · NPNobel Academy · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bacterial contamination in intensive care units is an important risk factor associated with increasing incidences of nosocomial infections. This study was conducted to study the bacterial colonization on commonly touched objects of intensive care units and antibiotic resistance pattern of bacterial isolates. Methods: This study was conducted in different intensive care units of Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal. A total of 235 swabs were collected from surfaces of bed rails, monitors, door handles, IV stands, telephone sets, nursing stations, medicine trolleys, sphygmomanometers, wash basin taps, dressing drums, stethoscopes, pulse oximeters, ventilators, defibrillators, and stretchers. Isolation, identification, and antibiotic susceptibility tests of the bacteria were performed following standard microbiological techniques. Results: Of 235 samples, bacterial growth was observed in 152 samples. A total of 90 samples of Conclusion: Bacterial contamination of the objects/instruments of the ICU was recorded to be high. The most common contaminating bacteria were

Identifiers

PMID35637744
PMCPMC9148222
OpenAlexW4281261195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.