Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35637737›Full record

ArticleEducational assessment, evaluation and accountability2023

Investigating the measurement of academic resilience in Aotearoa New Zealand using international large-scale assessment data.

Georgia Rudd, Kane Meissel, Frauke Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Georgia RuddFaculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92601, Symonds Street, Auckland, 1150 New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9455-5733
Kane MeisselFaculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92601, Symonds Street, Auckland, 1150 New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1867-8218
Frauke MeyerFaculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92601, Symonds Street, Auckland, 1150 New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7402-8896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Academic resilience captures academic success despite adversity and thus is an important concept for promoting equity within education. However, our understanding of how and why rates of academic resilience differ between contexts is currently limited by variation in the ways that the construct has been operationalised in quantitative research. Similarly, comparing the strength of protective factors that promote academic resilience is hindered by differing approaches to the measurement of academic resilience. This methodological variation has complicated attempts to reconcile disparate findings about academic resilience. The current study applied six commonly used operationalisations of academic resilience that combined different thresholds of high risk and high achievement, to three international large-scale assessments, to explore how these different operationalisations impacted the findings produced. The context of Aotearoa New Zealand was chosen as a case study to further academic resilience research within this context and investigate how academic resilience manifests in an education system with relatively high levels of average achievement alongside low levels of educational equity. Within international large-scale assessment datasets, prevalence rates differed markedly across subject areas, grade levels, and collection cycles, as a function of the measure of academic resilience employed, while the strength of protective factors was more consistent. Thresholds that were norm-referenced produced more consistent findings across the different datasets compared to thresholds that were criterion-referenced. High levels of missing data prevented the analysis of some datasets, and differences in the way that key constructs were measured undermined the comparability of findings across international large-scale assessments. The findings emphasise the strengths and limitations of utilising international large-scale assessment data for the study of academic resilience, particularly within the Aotearoa New Zealand context. Furthermore, the study highlights that researchers' methodological decisions have important impacts on the conclusions drawn about academic resilience. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11092-022-09384-0.

Indexed as

Academic resilience measurementAcademic resilience operationalisationInternational large-scale assessmentProtective factorsSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID35637737
PMCPMC9131980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.