ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2022
Performance evaluation of the XT MicroSlide assay pairs on the Vitros XT 7600 compared to VITROS single microslide assays on Vitros 5600.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analytical pitfalls in dry and wet chemistry platforms: From a trainee perspective.Practical laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Validation of Point-of-care Testing Device HemoCue® Glucose 201RT in Blood Glucose Estimation.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026Article
- Factors associated with anemia among adolescent girls in Western India: insights from a multi-centric cross-sectional study.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Assessing anemia burden and multifactorial contributors among pregnant women in Gujarat: a cross-sectional study integrating biochemical, nutritional, and geographic disparities.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Pediatric hospitals are always challenged by specimen volumes and thus any innovation in this realm is very welcome. With the introduction of Microslide assay pairs, we aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of the Vitros XT MicroSlide assay pairs on the Vitros XT 7600 compared to single MicroSlides. Design: Performance characteristics included within-run precision, analytical measurable range, method comparison, and interference verification. We compared six XT MicroSlide pairs on the Vitros XT 7600 with twelve corresponding single slide assays on the Vitros 5600 system. Results: The XT MicroSlides on Vitros XT 7600 demonstrated excellent precision, equivalent analytical measurable range, and strong method correlation with single slide assays on Vitros 5600 for most of the assays tested. Within-run CVs of the analytes ranged between 0.32% and 2.93% with between-run CV of less than 8.8% and linearity for all analytes was within the manufacturer's specified range. Interference studies showed comparable effects of hemolysis, lipemia, and bilirubin on both instruments. Conclusions: The XT MicroSlides are comparable to the single MicroSlide assays with improved efficiency, turnaround times and lower sample volumes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.