Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35637469›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2022

Periappendiceal fluid collection on preoperative computed tomography can be an indication for interval appendectomy: a retrospective study.

Shintaro Kanaka, Satoshi Mizutani, Yasuyuki Yokoyama, Takeshi Matsutani, Naoto Chihara, Akira Katsuno, Hideyuki Takata, Ryosuke Nakata, Keisuke Mishima, Yudai Wada and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shintaro KanakaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan. ks32814@nms.ac.jp.
Satoshi MizutaniDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Yasuyuki YokoyamaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Takeshi MatsutaniDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Naoto ChiharaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Akira KatsunoDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Hideyuki TakataDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Ryosuke NakataDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Keisuke MishimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Yudai WadaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Takao ShimizuDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Ryo YamagiwaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Takahiro HarunaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Yuka NakamuraDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Akira HamaguchiDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Nobuhiko TaniaiDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Hiroshi YoshidaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8602, Japan.
Nippon Medical School · JPNippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment strategies for acute appendicitis, such as emergency appendectomy (EA), interval appendectomy (IA), and repeating nonoperative management (NOM), are controversial. In this study, we examined the preoperative factors that can be used to distinguish which patients should undergo IA.

methodsWe retrospectively identified 902 patients who underwent surgery for appendicitis in our hospital from January 2010 to December 2021. Of these patients, 776 were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: those with a periappendiceal fluid collection (PAFC) on preoperative computed tomography (PAFC-positive group, n = 170) and those without a PAFC (PAFC-negative group, n = 606). In each group, we compared patients who underwent EA and IA.

resultsIn the PAFC-positive group, patients who underwent EA had a significantly higher postoperative complication rate than those who underwent IA (40.5% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.037). In the multivariate analysis, only the presence of PAFC was significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio, 7.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.73-18.60; p < 0.001). The presence of PAFC alone was not significantly associated with an increased risk of IA or NOM failure (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-11.7; p = 0.71). The rate of neoplasia on pathologic examination was significantly higher in the PAFC-positive than PAFC-negative group (7.6% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001); the rate of carcinoma was also higher in the PAFC-positive group (2.4% vs. 0.17%, p = 0.02).

conclusionsThe presence of PAFC on preoperative computed tomography was found to be a risk factor for postoperative complications but not IA or NOM failure. It was also correlated with neoplasia as the etiology of appendicitis. Therefore, PAFC positivity is useful as an indication for IA.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisCraniofacial AbnormalitiesHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcute appendicitisInterval appendectomyManagementPeriappendiceal fluid collection

Identifiers

PMID35637469
PMCPMC9153096
OpenAlexW4281713145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.