SynthesisBMC geriatrics2022
Prediction models for functional status in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disability risk prediction models in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic factors for functional decline in community-dwelling older adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European geriatric medicine · 2026Review
- The Moderating Role of Digital Literacy in the Relationship Between Cognitive Function and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identifying a fitness tool in early old-age to predict long-term risk of disability, severe disability, and mortality.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Primary healthcare professionals' perspectives on mobility limitation assessment and predictive model optimization for community-dwelling older adults: a qualitative research.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of Post-stroke Stiff-Knee Gait: A Narrative Review.American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Development of a predictive model for loss of functional and cognitive abilities in long-term care home residents: a protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Incremental predictive value of intrinsic capacity and environmental characteristics in the risk prediction of incident disability.JAR life · 2025Article
- Real-life intrinsic capacity screening data from the ICOPE-Care program.Nature aging · 2024Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Functional Disability: a Cohort Study of Japanese Older Adults in 2013-2019.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisability poses a burden for older persons, and is associated with poor outcomes and high societal costs. Prediction models could potentially identify persons who are at risk for disability. An up to date review of such models is missing.
objectiveTo identify models developed for the prediction of functional status in community dwelling older persons.
methodsA systematic review was performed including studies of older persons that developed and/or validated prediction models for the outcome functional status. Medline and EMBASE were searched, and reference lists and prospective citations were screened for additional references. Risk of bias was assessed using the PROBAST-tool. The performance of models was described and summarized, and the use of predictors was collated using the bag-of-words text mining procedure.
resultsForty-three studies were included and reported 167 evaluations of prediction models. The median c-statistic values for the multivariable development models ranged between 0.65 and 0.76 (minimum = 0.58, maximum = 0.90), and were consistently higher than the values of the validation models for which median c-statistic values ranged between 0.6 and 0.68 (minimum = 0.50, maximum = 0.81). A total of 559 predictors were used in the models. The five predictors most frequently used were gait speed (n = 47), age (n = 38), cognition (n = 27), frailty (n = 24), and gender (n = 22).
conclusionsNo model can be recommended for implementation in practice. However, frailty models appear to be the most promising, because frailty components (e.g. gait speed) and frailty indexes demonstrated good to excellent predictive performance. However, the risk of study bias was high. Substantial improvements can be made in the methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.