Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35637399›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2022

Metagenomic analysis of wastewater phageome from a University Hospital in Turkey.

Hanife Salih, Abdulkerim Karaynir, Melis Yalcin, Erman Oryasin, Can Holyavkin, Gamze Basbulbul, Bulent Bozdogan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metagenomic analysis of bacteriome and phageome of wastewater from a ceramic factory in Türkiye.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hanife SalihREDPROM Centre (Recombinant DNA and Recombinant Protein Research Centre), Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey. hanifesalih94@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2141-0669
Abdulkerim KaraynirREDPROM Centre (Recombinant DNA and Recombinant Protein Research Centre), Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0511-0869
Melis YalcinREDPROM Centre (Recombinant DNA and Recombinant Protein Research Centre), Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-4018
Erman OryasinREDPROM Centre (Recombinant DNA and Recombinant Protein Research Centre), Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1242-7434
Can HolyavkinGen Era Diagnostic, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4911-9494
Gamze BasbulbulREDPROM Centre (Recombinant DNA and Recombinant Protein Research Centre), Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8151-6321
Bulent BozdoganREDPROM Centre (Recombinant DNA and Recombinant Protein Research Centre), Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2469-9728
Adnan Menderes University · TRRecombinant Technologies (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage DNA analysis gives opportunity to understand living ecosystem of the environment where the samples are taken. In the present study, we analyzed phage DNA obtained from wastewater sample of university hospital sewage. After filtration, long high-speed centrifugation was done to collect phages. DNA was extracted from pellet by phenol chloroform extraction and used for NGS sequencing. The host profile, taxonomic and functional analyses were performed using MG-RAST, and ResFinder program was used for resistance gene detection. High amounts of reads belong to bacteriophage groups (~ 95%) from our DNA sample were obtained and all bacteriophage reads were found belonging to Caudovirales order and Myoviridae (56%), Siphoviridae (43%), and Podoviridae (0.02%) families. The most common host genera were Escherichia (88.20%), Salmonella (5.49%) and Staphylococcus (5.19%). SEED subsystems hits were mostly structural parts and KEGG Orthology hits were nucleotide- and carbohydrate metabolism-related genes. No anti-microbial resistance genes were detected. Our bacteriophage DNA purification method is favorable for phage metagenomic studies. Dominance of coliphages may explain infrequent Podoviridae. Dominancy of structural genes and auxiliary genes is probably due to abundance of lytic phages in our sample. Absence of antibiotic resistance genes even in hospital environment phages indicates that phages are not important carrier of resistance genes.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesPodoviridaeEcosystemHospitalsHumansTurkeyViromeWastewaterWastewaterAntibiotic resistanceBacteriophageEnvironmental metagenomicsEnvironmental microbiologyEnvironmental pollutionWastewater

Identifiers

PMID35637399
OpenAlexW4281720890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.