Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35637370›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2022

Common and stimulus-type-specific brain representations of negative affect.

Marta Čeko, Philip A Kragel, Choong-Wan Woo, Marina López-Solà, Tor D Wager

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Domain-General Neural Effects of Associative Learning and Expectations on Pain and Hedonic Taste Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The neurobiological cravings signature (NCS) as a predictive neuromarker of clinical outcomes in alcohol use disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  9. Neural Representations and Functional Connections Underlie Subjective Positive Affect.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ecologically-Valid Emotion Signatures Enhance Mood Disorder Diagnostics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marta ČekoInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA. marta.ceko@colorado.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8679-8145
Philip A KragelInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9463-6381
Choong-Wan WooCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7423-5422
Marina López-SolàSerra Hunter Programme, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Tor D WagerInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA. tor.d.wager@dartmouth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1936-5574

Funding

fMRI-based Biomarkers for Multiple Components of PainR01DA035484 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WAGER, TOR D. · 2013 to 2017
$3.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain contains both generalized and stimulus-type-specific representations of aversive events, but models of how these are integrated and related to subjective experience are lacking. We combined functional magnetic resonance imaging with predictive modeling to identify representations of generalized (common) and stimulus-type-specific negative affect across mechanical pain, thermal pain, aversive sounds and aversive images of four intensity levels each. This allowed us to examine how generalized and stimulus-specific representations jointly contribute to aversive experience. Stimulus-type-specific negative affect was largely encoded in early sensory pathways, whereas generalized negative affect was encoded in a distributed set of midline, forebrain, insular and somatosensory regions. All models specifically predicted negative affect rather than general salience or arousal and accurately predicted negative affect in independent samples, demonstrating robustness and generalizability. Common and stimulus-type-specific models were jointly important for predicting subjective experience. Together, these findings offer an integrated account of how negative affect is constructed in the brain and provide predictive neuromarkers for future studies.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingAffectHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.