Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35637355›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2022

Robotic oncologic colorectal surgery with a new robotic platform (CMR Versius): hope or hype? A preliminary experience from a full-robotic case-series.

Cristiano Huscher, Francesco Marchegiani, Francesco Cobellis, Patricia Tejedor, Carlos Pastor, Gianni Lazzarin, James Wheeler, Salomone Di Saverio

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Cristiano Huscher *Casa di Cura Cobellis, Vallo della Lucania, Salerno, Italy.
Francesco Marchegiani *Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Francesco CobellisCasa di Cura Cobellis, Vallo della Lucania, Salerno, Italy.
Patricia TejedorDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos PastorDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Clinic of Navarre, Madrid-Pamplona, Spain.
Gianni LazzarinDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Robotics and New Technologies, Policlinico Abano, Padua, Italy.
James WheelerCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Salomone Di SaverioGeneral Surgery Department "Paride Stefanini", La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. salomone.disaverio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5685-5022
Policlinico Abano Terme · ITUniversity of Padua · ITBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present case-series describes the first full-robotic colorectal resections performed with the new CMR Versius platform (Cambridge Medical Robotics Surgical, 1 Evolution Business Park, Cambridge, United Kingdom) by an experienced robotic surgeon.

methodsIn a period between July 2020 and December 2020, patients aged 18 years or older, who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer and were fit for minimally invasive surgery, underwent robotic colorectal resection with CMR Versius robotic platform at "Casa di Cura Cobellis" in Vallo della Lucania,Salerno, Italy. Three right colectomies, 2 sigmoid colectomies and 1 anterior rectal resection were performed. All the procedures were planned as fully robotic. Surgical data were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected database.

resultsFour patients were male and 2 patients were female with a median (range) age of 66 (47-72) years. One covering ileostomy was created. Full robotic splenic flexure mobilization was performed. No additional laparoscopic gestures or procedures were performed in this series except for clipping and stapling which were performed by the assistant surgeon due to the absence of robotic dedicated instruments. Two ileocolic anastomoses, planned as robotic-sewn, were performed extracorporeally. One Clavien-Dindo II complication occurred due to a postoperative blood transfusion. Median total operative time was 160 (145-294) min for right colectomies, 246 (191-300) min for sigmoid colectomies and 250 min for the anterior rectal resection.

conclusionsThe present series confirms the feasibility of full-robotic colorectal resections while highlighting the strengths and the limitations of the CMR Versius platform in colorectal surgery. New devices will need more clinical development to be comparable to the current standard.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsColorectal SurgeryLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresColectomyFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesColorectal cancerMinimally invasive surgeryRoboticsRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID35637355
PMCPMC9360145
OpenAlexW4281721875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.