ArticleScientific reports2022
Viability, task switching, and fall avoidance of the simplest dynamic walker.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adapting lateral stepping control to walk on winding paths.Journal of biomechanics · 2025Article
- Controlling a simple model of bipedal walking to adapt to a wide range of target step lengths and step frequencies.PloS one · 2025Article
- Probability of lateral instability while walking on winding paths.Journal of biomechanics · 2024Article
- A model of task-level human stepping regulation yields semistable walking.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- A model of task-level human stepping regulation yields semistable walking.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Viability leads to the emergence of gait transitions in learning agile quadrupedal locomotion on challenging terrains.Nature communications · 2024Article
- The condition for dynamic stability in humans walking with feedback control.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- How Healthy Older Adults Enact Lateral Maneuvers While Walking.Gait & posture · 2024Article
- Generalizing stepping concepts to non-straight walking.Journal of biomechanics · 2023Article
- Rethinking margin of stability: Incorporating step-to-step regulation to resolve the paradox.Journal of biomechanics · 2022Article
- Adaptive multi-objective control explains how humans make lateral maneuvers while walking.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Walking humans display great versatility when achieving task goals, like avoiding obstacles or walking alongside others, but the relevance of this to fall avoidance remains unknown. We recently demonstrated a functional connection between the motor regulation needed to achieve task goals (e.g., maintaining walking speed) and a simple walker's ability to reject large disturbances. Here, for the same model, we identify the viability kernel-the largest state-space region where the walker can step forever via at least one sequence of push-off inputs per state. We further find that only a few basins of attraction of the speed-regulated walker's steady-state gaits can fully cover the viability kernel. This highlights a potentially important role of task-level motor regulation in fall avoidance. Therefore, we posit an adaptive hierarchical control/regulation strategy that switches between different task-level regulators to avoid falls. Our task switching controller only requires a target value of the regulated observable-a "task switch"-at every walking step, each chosen from a small, predetermined collection. Because humans have typically already learned to perform such goal-directed tasks during nominal walking conditions, this suggests that the "information cost" of biologically implementing such controllers for the nervous system, including cognitive demands in humans, could be quite low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.