Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35636910›Full record

ReviewInfectious disease clinics of North America2022

COVID-19 Vaccines.

William O Hahn, Zanthia Wiley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious disease clinics of North America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Social Representations of Hesitant Brazilians about Vaccination against COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of COVID-19 in Older Adults.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

William O HahnDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: willhahn@uw.edu.
Zanthia WileyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Infectious Diseases Clinic, 550 Peachtree Street NE, 7th Floor - Medical Office Tower, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article is a narrative review of the rapidly moving coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine field with an emphasis on clinical efficacy established in both randomized trials and postmarketing surveillance of clinically available vaccines. We review the major clinical trials that supported authorization for general use of the Janssen (Ad.26.CoV2), Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), and Moderna (mRNA-1273) vaccines and the publicly available postmarketing information with the goal of providing a broad, clinically relevant comparison of efficacy and safety. This review is primarily focused on the US market.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19Janssen (Ad.26.CoV2)mRNA vaccinepost-marketing vaccine surveillanceSARS-CoV-2Vaccinevaccine efficacy trials

Identifiers

PMID35636910
PMCPMC8802612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.