Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35636818›Full record

ReviewClinics in laboratory medicine2022

Analytic and Clinical Performance of Major Commercial Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Molecular Assays in the United States.

Michelle R Campbell, Matthew J Binnicker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in laboratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michelle R CampbellDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Translational Research, Innovation, and Test Development Office, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW - Hilton 4-76, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Matthew J BinnickerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW - Hilton 4-54, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Electronic address: binnicker.matthew@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of commercially available molecular assays in response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been essential in identifying positive cases and guiding state and national response plans. With over 200 SARS-CoV-2 molecular tests having received emergency use authorization by the US Food and Drug Administration, numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate these methods and compare their analytical and clinical performance. By applying the lessons learned from the rapid development of molecular assays in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the diagnostic industry will be better prepared to respond to future outbreaks of novel infectious diseases.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Disease OutbreaksHumansPandemicsUnited StatesAnalytical sensitivityAnalytical specificityClinical performanceCOVID-19Emergency use authorizationMolecularSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35636818
PMCPMC8858713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.