Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35636804›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

Exploring the translation process for multilingual implementation research studies: a collaborative autoethnography.

Victoria Haldane, Betty Peiyi Li, Shiliang Ge, Jason Zekun Huang, Hongyu Huang, Losang Sadutshang, Zhitong Zhang, Pande Pasang, Jun Hu, Xiaolin Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Victoria HaldaneDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Betty Peiyi LiDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shiliang GeTermerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jason Zekun HuangDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hongyu HuangDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Losang SadutshangDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zhitong ZhangDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pande PasangShigatse Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Shigatse, Samzhubze District, China.
Jun HuShigatse Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Shigatse, Samzhubze District, China.
Xiaolin WeiDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada xiaolin.wei@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn an increasingly globalised and interconnected world, evidence to evaluate complex interventions may be generated in multiple languages. However, despite its influence in shaping the evidence base, there is little literature explicitly connecting the translation process to the goals and processes of implementation research. This study aims to explore the processes and experience of an international implementation research team conducting a process evaluation of a complex intervention in Tibet Autonomous Region, China.

methodsThis study uses a collaborative autoethnographic approach to explore the translation process from Chinese or Tibetan to English of key stakeholder interview transcripts. In this approach, multiple researchers and translators contributed their reflections, and conducted joint analysis through dialogue, reflection and with consideration of multiple perspectives. Seven researchers involved with the translation process contributed their perspectives through in-depth interviews or written reflections and jointly analysed the resulting data.

resultsWe describe the translation process, synthesise key challenges including developing a 'voice' and tone as a translator, conveying the depth of idioms across languages, and distance from the study context. We further offer lessons learnt including the importance of word banks with unified translations of words and phrases created iteratively during the translation process, the need to collaborate between translators and the introspective work necessary for translators to explore their positionality and reflexivity during the work. We then offer a summary of these learnings for other implementation research teams.

conclusionOur findings emphasise that in order to ensure rigour in their work, implementation research teams using qualitative data should make concerted effort to consider both the translation process as well as its outcomes. Given the numerous multinational or multilingual implementation research studies using qualitative methods, there is a need for further consideration and reflection on the translation process.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchTranslatingChinaHumansautoethnographyqualitative methodsresearch methodsTranslation

Identifiers

PMID35636804
PMCPMC9152927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.