Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35636803›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Benefits and limitations of business process model notation in modelling patient healthcare trajectory: a scoping review protocol.

Said Abasse Kassim, Jean-Baptiste Gartner, Laurence Labbé, Paolo Landa, Catherine Paquet, Frédéric Bergeron, Célia Lemaire, André Côté

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. System Models for Synchronous Strategies in Operational Healthcare Forecasting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Said Abasse KassimDépartement de management, Faculté des sciences de l'administration, Universite Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2136-0825
Jean-Baptiste GartnerDépartement de management, Faculté des sciences de l'administration, Universite Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-6112
Laurence LabbéDépartement de management, Faculté des sciences de l'administration, Universite Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Paolo LandaDépartement d'opérations et systèmes de décision, Faculté des sciences de l'administration, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada paolo.landa@fsa.ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6532-6747
Catherine PaquetCentre de Recherche CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Frédéric BergeronBibliothèque, Direction des services-conseils, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Célia LemaireLaboratoire Humanis, EM Strasbourg-Business School, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
André CôtéDépartement de management, Faculté des sciences de l'administration, Universite Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe adoption of business process model notation (BPMN) in modelling healthcare trajectory can enhance the efficiency and efficacy of healthcare organisations, improve patient outcomes while restraining costs. Existing systematic reviews have been inconclusive regarding the effectiveness of BPMN in modelling healthcare trajectory. The aims of this scoping review are to map and aggregate existing evidence on the benefits and limitations associated with BPMN in healthcare trajectory, highlighting areas of improvement on BPMN and its extensions in healthcare. We will assess BPMN's ability to model key dimensions or concepts of the healthcare process and to meet the needs of stakeholders. The review will highlight the advantages of this approach to support clinical activities and decision-making processes associated with the healthcare trajectory, proposing a conceptual framework for improving the use of BPMN in healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be performed in accordance with the methodological framework suggested by Arksey and O'Malley. A wide range of electronic databases and grey literature sources will be systematically searched using predefined keywords. The review will include any study design focusing on the application of the BPMN approach for optimising healthcare trajectories, published in either English or French from 1 January 2004 to 9 December 2021. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles and select articles meeting the inclusion criteria. A customised data extraction form will be used to extract data. The results will be presented using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis on qualitative data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics approval is not required. Review findings will be used to advance understanding about BPMN, its extensions and application in healthcare trajectory optimisation. The review will develop recommendations on tailoring BPMN strategies for optimising care pathways and decision-making processes. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, conferences and discussions with relevant organisations and stakeholders.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareResearch DesignHealth FacilitiesHumansPeer ReviewScoping Reviews as Topicbusiness process modelling notationcare pathwayshealthcare managementhealthcare processesHealthcare trajectoryscoping review

Identifiers

PMID35636803
PMCPMC9152926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.