Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35636790›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a mixed-method study.

Nebiyu Dereje, Abigel Tesfaye, Beamlak Tamene, Dina Alemeshet, Haymanot Abe, Nathnael Tesfa, Saron Gedion, Tigist Biruk, Yabets Lakew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. BMJ open · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Knowledge, acceptance and concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women on the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia: A cross-sectional study.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nebiyu DerejeDepartment of Public Health, MyungSung Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia neba.jahovy@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5406-4171
Abigel TesfayeDepartment of Medicine, MyungSung Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Beamlak TameneDepartment of Medicine, MyungSung Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dina AlemeshetDepartment of Medicine, MyungSung Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Haymanot AbeDepartment of Medicine, MyungSung Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Nathnael TesfaDepartment of Medicine, MyungSung Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Saron GedionDepartment of Medicine, MyungSung Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tigist BirukDepartment of Medicine, MyungSung Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yabets LakewDepartment of Medicine, MyungSung Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveData on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is limited in Ethiopia and other parts of Africa. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the level of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and its associated factors in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

designA community-based concurrent mixed-method study.

settingIn a community setting.

participantsAdult residents (n=422) of Akaki Kality subcity who were recruited by a two stage sampling technique and 24 adults who were selected purposively were included for the quantitative and qualitative part of the study respectively. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were collected by face-to-face interview using a semistructured questionnaire. Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were identified by multivariable binary logistic regression model.

resultsOne out five (19.1%, 95% CI 15.3% to 24.6%) participants were not willing to get vaccinated. In the multivariable analysis, vaccine hesitancy was significantly associated with being female (aOR=1.97; 95% CI 1.10 to 3.89), having negative attitude towards COVID-19 and its preventive measures (aOR=1.75; 95% CI 1.08 to 3.02), and primary information source being social media (internet) (aOR=3.59; 95% CI 1.75 to 7.37). Study participants have predominantly stated that they did not have enough information about the vaccine, feared it would not be effective or have too many side effects, and reflected their uncertainty towards the quality of the vaccine.

conclusionsA considerable proportion of the people in Addis Ababa have concerns on COVID-19 vaccines and unwilling to accept them. This was due to the misconceptions, negative attitudes and use of social media as their primary source of information. Providing the community with health education and consistent efforts to enhance the prevention measures are important, particularly using different medias including social media.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansMaleVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesattitudeCOVID-19HesitancyknowledgeVaccine

Identifiers

PMID35636790
PMCPMC9152622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.