Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35636787›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Three-arm randomised controlled trial of an m-health app and digital engagement strategy for improving treatment adherence and reducing suicidal ideation in young people: study protocol.

Lauren McGillivray, Daniel Z Q Gan, Quincy Wong, Jin Han, Sarah Hetrick, Helen Christensen, Michelle Torok

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren McGillivrayBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9022-0274
Daniel Z Q GanBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Quincy WongSchool of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jin HanBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7624-9468
Sarah HetrickDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, UK.
Helen ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Michelle TorokBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia m.torok@unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3741-8075
Black Dog Institute · AUWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionYouth suicidal ideation and behaviour is concerning due to its widespread prevalence, morbidity and potentially fatal consequences. Digital mental health interventions have been found to improve access to low-cost and high-quality support for a range of mental health issues, yet there are few digital interventions available for suicide prevention in young people. In addition, no studies have examined how digital engagement strategies may impact the engagement and efficacy of digital interventions in suicide prevention. The current protocol describes a three-arm parallel randomised controlled trial. A therapeutic smartphone application ('LifeBuoy'; intervention condition) will be tested against a condition that consists of the LifeBuoy application plus access to a digital engagement strategy ('LifeBuoy+engagement'; intervention condition) to determine whether the addition of the digital strategy improves app engagement metrics. To establish the efficacy of the LifeBuoy application, both of these intervention conditions will be tested against an attention-matched control condition (a placebo app). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 669 young Australians aged 17-24 years who have experienced suicidal ideation in the past 30 days will be recruited by Facebook advertisement. The primary outcomes will be suicidal ideation severity and level of app engagement. Primary analyses will use an intention-to-treat approach and compare changes from baseline to 30-day, 60-day and 120-day follow-up time points relative to the control group using mixed-effect modelling. A subset of participants in the intervention groups will be interviewed on their experience with the app and engagement strategy. Qualitative data will be analysed using an inductive approach, independent of a theoretical confirmative method to identify the group themes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HC210400). The results of the trial will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications in scientific journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621001247864.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineAdolescentAustraliaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSuicidal IdeationTreatment Adherence and ComplianceMENTAL HEALTHPSYCHIATRYSuicide & self-harm

Identifiers

PMID35636787
PMCPMC9152944
OpenAlexW4281915525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.