Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35636621›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2022

Validation of the Decipher genomic classifier in patients receiving salvage radiotherapy without hormone therapy after radical prostatectomy - an ancillary study of the SAKK 09/10 randomized clinical trial.

A Dal Pra, P Ghadjar, S Hayoz, V Y T Liu, D E Spratt, D J S Thompson, E Davicioni, H-C Huang, X Zhao, Y Liu and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. How to tailor the radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy in the modern era of molecular imaging, genomic testing, and technology development?Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Prognostic significance of a negative PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

A Dal PraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: alan.dalpra@med.miami.edu.
P GhadjarCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
S HayozSAKK Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland.
V Y T LiuDecipher Biosciences (a subsidiary of Veracyte Inc.), San Diego, USA.
D E SprattDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.
D J S ThompsonEmmes Canada, Vancouver, Canada.
E DavicioniDecipher Biosciences (a subsidiary of Veracyte Inc.), San Diego, USA.
H-C HuangDecipher Biosciences (a subsidiary of Veracyte Inc.), San Diego, USA.
X ZhaoDecipher Biosciences (a subsidiary of Veracyte Inc.), San Diego, USA.
Y LiuDecipher Biosciences (a subsidiary of Veracyte Inc.), San Diego, USA.
C SchärSAKK Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland.
P GutKantonsspital Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland.
L PlasswilmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
T HölscherDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
B PolatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
G HildebrandtUniversity Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
A-C MüllerUniversity Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
A PollackDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
G N ThalmannDepartment of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
D ZwahlenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
D M AebersoldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Veracyte (United States) · USSwiss Group For Clinical Cancer Research · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Bern · CHCase Western Reserve University · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKantonsspital Winterthur · CHLuzerner Kantonsspital · CHTU Dresden · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Rostock · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Decipher genomic classifier (GC) has shown to independently prognosticate outcomes in prostate cancer. The objective of this study was to validate the GC in a randomized phase III trial of dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND

methodsA clinical-grade whole-transcriptome assay was carried out on radical prostatectomy samples obtained from patients enrolled in Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) 09/10, a phase III trial of 350 men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy randomized to 64 Gy versus 70 Gy without concurrent hormonal therapy or pelvic nodal RT. A prespecified statistical plan was developed to assess the impact of the GC on clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was biochemical progression; secondary endpoints were clinical progression and time to hormone therapy. Multivariable analyses adjusted for age, T-category, Gleason score, postradical prostatectomy persistent prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA at randomization, and randomization arm were conducted, accounting for competing risks.

resultsThe analytic cohort of 226 patients was representative of the overall trial, with a median follow-up of 6.3 years (interquartile range 6.1-7.2 years). The GC (high versus low-intermediate) was independently associated with biochemical progression [subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-3.60; P < 0.001], clinical progression (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.32-3.98; P = 0.003), and use of hormone therapy (sHR 2.99, 95% CI 1.55-5.76; P = 0.001). GC high patients had a 5-year freedom from biochemical progression of 45% versus 71% for GC low-intermediate. Dose escalation did not benefit the overall cohort, nor patients with lower versus higher GC scores.

conclusionsThis study represents the first contemporary randomized controlled trial in patients treated with early SRT without concurrent hormone therapy or pelvic nodal RT that has validated the prognostic utility of the GC. Independent of standard clinicopathologic variables and RT dose, high-GC patients were more than twice as likely than lower-GC patients to experience biochemical and clinical progression and receive of salvage hormone therapy. These data confirm the clinical value of Decipher GC to personalize the use of concurrent systemic therapy in the postoperative salvage setting.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsSalvage TherapyGenomicsHormonesHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesHormonesProstate-Specific AntigenbiomarkersDecipherpostoperative radiotherapyprognosisprostate cancersalvage radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35636621
OpenAlexW4281960705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.