Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35636070›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2022

Patient perceptions of higher-dose naloxone nasal spray for opioid overdose.

Justin C Strickland, Katherine R Marks, Kirsten E Smith, Jennifer D Ellis, J Gregory Hobelmann, Andrew S Huhn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Perceived stigma and its role in substance use disorder treatment completion.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Justin C StricklandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA; Ashley Addiction Treatment, 800 Tydings Ln, Havre De Grace, MD 21078, USA. Electronic address: jstric14@jhmi.edu.
Katherine R MarksDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 1100 Veterans Drive, Medical Behavioral Science Building Room 140, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. Electronic address: katie.marks@uky.edu.
Kirsten E SmithNational Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, 251 Bayview Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Jennifer D EllisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
J Gregory HobelmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA; Ashley Addiction Treatment, 800 Tydings Ln, Havre De Grace, MD 21078, USA.
Andrew S HuhnDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA; Ashley Addiction Treatment, 800 Tydings Ln, Havre De Grace, MD 21078, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

HUMAN BEHAVIORAL PHARMACOLOGY OF SUBSTANCE ABUSET32DA007209 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Eric C. Strain, Elise M Weerts · 1985 to 2026
$12.9M
Evaluating Suvorexant for Sleep Disturbance in Opioid Use DisorderUG3DA048734 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DUNN, KELLY E, HUHN, ANDREW S · 2019 to 2020
$2.2M
Behavioral Economics of Reduced-Nicotine Cigarettes: Interaction of Expectancy and Nicotine Dose ReductionR03DA054098 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STRICKLAND, JUSTIN CHARLES · 2021 to 2021
$123k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA054098NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007209NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA048734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigher-dose formulations of naloxone were recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of opioid overdose. These products were developed based on projected saturation of high-potency fentanyl analogues in the illicit marketplace although the evidence base for their necessity is still under scrutiny. Concern has been raised that unintended reductions in patient acceptance of naloxone may occur due to increased precipitated withdrawal risk associated with higher naloxone doses. A well-founded and time-sensitive call for representation of people who use drugs in this decision-making process has been made. This study provides the first data on patient perceptions of higher-dose formulations to inform this scientific debate and distribution efforts.

methodsPatients (N=1152) entering treatment for opioid use disorder at one of 49 addiction treatment facilities located across the United States completed a preference assessment of naloxone nasal spray formulations. Patients selected a formulation preference across three scenarios (administration for self, administration to others, community responder administration).

resultsA majority of respondents that had been administered naloxone previously reported that their most recent overdose reversal included two or more naloxone administrations (59.9%). Most respondents either had no preference (48.4%) or preferred a higher-dose formulation (35.9%) if personally experiencing an overdose. Similar preference distributions were observed for administration to others and by community responders. Relative to standard-dose preference, respondents preferring higher-dose formulations had a greater odds of recent suspected fentanyl exposure.

conclusionsThese data inform patients, advocates, and policy-makers considering distribution and utilization of naloxone formulations by reporting perspectives of patients with opioid use and overdose experience. Limited evidence for widespread avoidance of higher-dose formulations was found. As real-world evidence of acceptability and effectiveness emerges, either supporting or refuting the widespread need for higher-dose naloxone formulations, it is the responsibility of the scientific and public health community to be responsive to those data.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNasal SpraysUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNasal SpraysFentanylHarm reductionNaloxoneOpioidOverdosePrevention

Identifiers

PMID35636070
PMCPMC9378440
OpenAlexW4281550170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.