Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35636018›Full record

ArticleRedox biology2022

Autoimmunity to selenoprotein P predicts breast cancer recurrence.

Kamil Demircan, Qian Sun, Ylva Bengtsson, Petra Seemann, Johan Vallon-Christersson, Martin Malmberg, Lao H Saal, Lisa Rydén, Waldemar B Minich, Åke Borg and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Redox biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02306096 (SCAN-B), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02306096 recruitingnot on this map

SCAN-B: The Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network - Breast Initiative

TypeobservationalSponsorLund UniversityRan2010 to 2031Enrolled20,000ConditionsBreast Neoplasms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Advances in the role of GPX3 in ovarian cancer (Review).International journal of oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kamil DemircanInstitute for Experimental Endocrinology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Biomedical Innovation Academy (BIA), Berlin, Germany.
Qian SunInstitute for Experimental Endocrinology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Ylva BengtssonDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Petra SeemannInstitute for Experimental Endocrinology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; selenOmed GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Johan Vallon-ChristerssonDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Martin MalmbergDepartment of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Lao H SaalDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lisa RydénDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Waldemar B MinichInstitute for Experimental Endocrinology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Åke BorgDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jonas ManjerDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Lutz SchomburgInstitute for Experimental Endocrinology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: Lutz.schomburg@charite.de.
Lund University · SEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DESkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow concentrations of serum selenium (Se) and its main transporter selenoprotein P (SELENOP) are associated with a poor prognosis following breast cancer diagnosis. Recently, natural autoantibodies (aAb) with antagonistic properties to SELENOP uptake have been identified in healthy subjects, and in patients with thyroid disease. Given the potential transport disrupting properties, we hypothesized that breast cancer patients with SELENOP-aAb may have a poor prognosis.

methodsSELENOP-aAb along with serum Se, SELENOP and GPX3 activity were determined in serum samples of 1988 patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer enrolled in the multicentre SCAN-B study. Patients were followed for ∼9 years and multivariate Cox regression models were applied to assess hazard ratios.

resultsApplying a cut-off based on outlier detection, we identified 7.65% of patients with SELENOP-aAb. Autoantibody titres correlated positively to total Se and SELENOP concentrations, but not to GPX3 activity, supporting a negative role of SELENOP-aAb on Se transport. SELENOP-aAb were associated with age, but independent of tumor characteristics. After fully adjusting for potential confounders, SELENOP-aAb were associated with higher recurrence, HR(95%CI) = 1.87(1.17-2.99), particularly in patients with low Se concentrations, HR(95%CI) = 2.16(1.20-3.88). Associations of SELENOP-aAb with recurrence and mortality were linear and dose-dependent, with fully adjusted HR(95%CI) per log increase of 1.25(1.01-1.55) and 1.31(1.13-1.51), respectively.

conclusionOur results indicate a prognostic and pathophysiological relevance of SELENOP-aAb in breast cancer, with potential relevance for other malignancies. Assessment of SELENOP-aAb at time of diagnosis identifies patients with a distinctly elevated risk for a poor prognosis, independent of established prognostic factors, who may respond favourably to Se supplementation.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSeleniumAutoantibodiesAutoimmunityFemaleHumansSelenoprotein PAutoantibodiesSeleniumSELENOP protein, humanSelenoprotein PCohort studyGlutathione peroxidasePrognosisSeleniumSELENOP

Identifiers

PMID35636018
PMCPMC9157254
OpenAlexW4281486253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.