Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3563580›Full record

ArticleSouthern medical journal1987

Gallbladder surgery in patients over 60: is there an increased risk?

N Smith, M H Max

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Southern medical journal, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

N Smith
M H Max

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We reviewed the records of 101 patients over the age of 60 who had exploration and cholecystectomy in 1982 at Norfolk General Hospital. There were 52 elective and 49 emergency cases. Women comprised 57.4% of the patients, and almost 50% of the patients were over the age of 70. Forty-nine percent of the cases were emergencies. All but two of the patients had cholecystectomy. The average hospital stay was 12 days for the elective group and 19 days for the urgent group. Complications extended the average hospital stay to 23 days. Although complications developed in 35 patients, only 14 had major complications that were life-threatening and/or extended the hospital stay. Of these, four were in elective cases (7%) and the remainder (21%) were in the urgent group. A major complication more than doubled the average hospital stay to 29 days. There were three deaths (3% of the entire group), all in patients who had emergency exploration, and all in patients over age 70. We advocate earlier elective cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis--before patients reach an older age, when associated systemic diseases increase their overall risk should emergency operation be necessary.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCholecystitisCholelithiasisEmergenciesFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRisk

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.