Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35635769›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2022

No robust multispecies coexistence in a canonical model of plant-soil feedbacks.

Zachary R Miller, Pablo Lechón-Alonso, Stefano Allesina

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zachary R MillerDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9762-8301
Pablo Lechón-AlonsoDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2229-4778
Stefano AllesinaDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0313-8374

Funding

National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1746045)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-soil feedbacks (PSFs) are considered a key mechanism generating frequency-dependent dynamics in plant communities. Negative feedbacks, in particular, are often invoked to explain coexistence and the maintenance of diversity in species-rich communities. However, the primary modelling framework used to study PSFs considers only two plant species, and we lack clear theoretical expectations for how these complex interactions play out in communities with natural levels of diversity. Here, we extend this canonical model of PSFs to include an arbitrary number of plant species and analyse the dynamics. Surprisingly, we find that coexistence of more than two species is virtually impossible, suggesting that alternative theoretical frameworks are needed to describe feedbacks observed in diverse natural communities. Drawing on our analysis, we discuss future directions for PSF models and implications for experimental study of PSF-mediated coexistence in the field.

Indexed as

EcosystemSoilFeedbackPlantsSoilBever modelbimatrix gamescoexistencelegacy effectsplant-soil feedbacksreplicator equation

Identifiers

PMID35635769
PMCPMC9327519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.