Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35635754›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2022

Access to and Use of Internet and Social Media by Low-Morbidity Stroke Survivors Participating in a National Web-Based Secondary Stroke Prevention Trial: Cross-sectional Survey.

Brigid Clancy, Billie Bonevski, Coralie English, Amanda L Baker, Alyna Turner, Parker Magin, Michael Pollack, Robin Callister, Ashleigh Guillaumier

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Brigid ClancyThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2405-6327
Billie BonevskiFlinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8505-622X
Coralie EnglishThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5910-7927
Amanda L BakerThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-7146
Alyna TurnerThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7389-2546
Parker MaginThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8071-8749
Michael PollackThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8587-0934
Robin CallisterThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5592-6132
Ashleigh GuillaumierThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5163-3228
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUDeakin University · AUFlinders University · AUHunter New England Local Health District · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundeHealth applications for stroke are a growing area of research that has yielded promising results. However, little is known about how stroke survivors engage with the internet, social media, and other digital technologies on a day-to-day basis.

objectiveThis study had three main objectives: to describe the type, frequency, and purpose of technology use among a cohort of low-morbidity stroke survivors; to investigate associations between social media use and participant factors, including sociodemographics, physical function, and independence in activities of daily living; and to investigate associations between stroke-related health risk factors and the use of the internet to search for health and medical information.

methodsThis study is a secondary analysis of data obtained during a national randomized controlled trial-Prevent 2

resultsData from 354 participants were included in the analysis. Approximately 79.1% (280/354) of participants used the internet at least daily, 40.8% (118/289) accessed social media on their phone or tablet daily, and 46.4% (134/289) looked up health and medical information at least monthly. Women were 2.7 times more likely to use social media (adjusted odds ratio 2.65, 95% CI 1.51-4.72), and people aged >75 years were significantly less likely to use social media compared with those aged <55 years (adjusted odds ratio 0.17, 95% CI 0.07-0.44). Health risk factors were not found to be associated with searching for health- or medical-related information.

conclusionsThe internet appears to be a viable platform to engage with stroke survivors who may not be high-morbidity to conduct research and provide information and health interventions. This is important given that they are at high risk of recurrent stroke regardless of their level of disability. Exploring the technology use behaviors and the possibility of eHealth among survivors who experience higher levels of morbidity or disability because of their stroke is an area of research that warrants further study.

Indexed as

Social MediaStrokeActivities of Daily LivingAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMorbiditySurvivorsdigital healtheHealthinformation-seeking behaviorinternet usemobile phonerecurrent strokesocial mediastrokestroke survivorweb-based

Identifiers

PMID35635754
PMCPMC9153916
OpenAlexW4213450626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.