Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35635641›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and global health2022

Prevalence and Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in the Population of St. Petersburg, Russia.

Ekaterina V Parshina, Alexey B Zulkarnaev, Alexey D Tolkach, Andrey V Ivanov, Pavel N Kislyy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ekaterina V Parshina *Nephrology and Dialysis Department, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital, 154, Fontanka Emb., Saint-Petersburg, 198103, Russian Federation. e.parshina@spbu.ru.ORCID 0000-0003-3625-1824
Alexey B Zulkarnaev *Surgical Department of Transplantology and Dialysis, M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, 61/2, Shchepkina Str., Moscow, 129110, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0001-5405-7887
Alexey D TolkachNephrology and Dialysis Department, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital, 154, Fontanka Emb., Saint-Petersburg, 198103, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0003-4483-6654
Andrey V IvanovHuman Genetics Department, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital, 154, Fontanka Emb., Saint-Petersburg, 198103, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-1676-7754
Pavel N KislyyPolyclinic Department №4, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital, 154, Fontanka Emb., Saint-Petersburg, 198103, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0003-0745-8260
St Petersburg University · RUMoscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of seropositive status for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-IgA, -IgM, and -IgG; its dynamics in connection with restrictive measures during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic; and the quantitative dynamics of antibody levels in the population of St. Petersburg, Russia.

methodsFrom May to November 2020, a retrospective analysis of Saint Petersburg State University Hospital laboratory database was performed. The database included 158,283 test results of 87,067 patients for SARS-CoV-2 detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antibody detection of SARS-CoV-2-IgA, -IgM, and -IgG. The dynamics of antibody level was assessed using R v.3.6.3.

resultsThe introduction of a universal lockdown was effective in containing the spread of COVID-19. The proportion of seropositive patients gradually decreased; approximately 50% of these patients remained seropositive for IgM after 3-4 weeks; for IgG, by follow-up week 22; and for IgA, by week 12. The maximum decrease in IgG and IgA was observed 3-4 months and 2 months after the detection of the seropositive status, respectively.

conclusionsThe epidemiological study of post-infection immunity to COVID-19 demonstrates significant differences in the dynamics of IgA, IgM, and IgG seropositivity and in PCR test results over time, which is linked to the introduction of restrictive measures. Both the proportion of seropositive patients and the level of all antibodies decreased in terms of the dynamics, and only approximately half of these patients remained IgG-positive 6 months post-infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralCommunicable Disease ControlHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MAntibodyCOVID-19QuarantineSARS-CoV-2SeropositivitySeroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID35635641
PMCPMC9148942
OpenAlexW4281900690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.