ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2022
A major depressive disorder diagnosis approach based on EEG signals using dictionary learning and functional connectivity features.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Beyond the label "major depressive disorder"-detailed characterization of study population matters for EEG-biomarker research.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Resting-State Electroencephalogram Depression Diagnosis Based on Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Comparative Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Machine Learning Model for Computer-Aided Depression Screening among Young Adults Using Wireless EEG Headset.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
- Machine learning approaches for diagnosing depression using EEG: A review.Translational neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) as a psychiatric illness negatively affects the behavior and daily life of the patients.Therefore, the early MDD diagnosis can help to cure the patients more efficiently and prevent adverse effects, although its unclear manifestations make the early diagnosis challenging. Nowadays, many studies have proposed automatic early MDD diagnosis methods based on electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. This study also presents an automated EEG-based MDD diagnosis framework based on Dictionary learning (DL) approaches and functional connectivity features. Firstly, a feature space of MDD and healthy control (HC) participants were constructed via functional connectivity features.Next, DL-based classification approaches such as Label Consistent K-SVD (LC-KSVD) and Correlation-based Label Consistent K-SVD (CLC-KSVD) methods, were utilized to perform the classification task. A public dataset was used, consisting of EEG signals from 34 MDD patients and 30 HC subjects, to evaluate the proposed method. To validate the proposed method, 10-fold cross-validation technique with 100 iterations was employed, providing accuracy (AC), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), F1-score (F1), and false discovery rate (FDR) performance metrics. The results show that LC-KSVD2 and CLC-KSVD2 performed efficiently in classifying MDD and HC cases. The best classification performance was obtained by the LCKSVD2 method, with average AC of 99.0%, SE of 98.9%, SP of 99.2%, F1 of 99.0%, and FDR of 0.8%. According to the results, the proposed method provides an accurate performance and, therefore, it can be developed into a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tool for automatic MDD diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35635612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.