Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35635590›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2023

Medium term results of the cementless Oxford mobile bearing medial unicompartmental knee replacement.

J R Manara, Bristol Knee Group, P White, R Bray, Hywel Davies, Jonathan Eldridge, Andrew Porteous, J R Murray

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J R ManaraAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK. jonathanmanara@doctors.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6863-2042
Bristol Knee Group
P WhiteUniversity of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, UK.
R BrayKnee Research Team, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Hywel DaviesAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK.
Jonathan EldridgeAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK.
Andrew PorteousAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK.
J R MurrayAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK.
Southmead Hospital · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) has well-documented benefits over Total Knee Replacement in the treatment of anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. There has been an increasing move from cemented to cementless UKR over the last decade. This non-design centre study assesses the initial experience using the cementless Oxford medial partial knee replacement and provides medium term revision data, as well as Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

methodsA cohort of 200 consecutive patients undergoing medial UKR using the cementless Oxford were identified from our knee groups prospectively collected database. Cases were performed in a single centre under the care of one of four surgeons. All patients were beyond the 5-year minimum timepoint following UKR surgery in order to produce medium term results, at a mean of 7.9 years. Eligible patients completed a postal questionnaire to collect PROMs: Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC and modified American Knee Society Score questionnaires in January 2020 and had their clinical records reviewed.

resultsThe survivorship in our cohort was 94.5% at a mean follow up of 7.9 years following surgery. There were 11 re-operations in total with a three percent risk of re-operation within the first 18 months following surgery. There was a sustained improvement in Oxford Knee Score with a near 20 points improvement on pre-operative scores.

conclusionsOur results provide further evidence that partial knee replacements using the cementless Oxford produce good clinical outcomes. Revision rates are similar to those published in the National Joint Registry. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansKnee JointProsthesis DesignReoperationTreatment OutcomeMedial mobile bearing cementlessOxford microplastyPartial kneeUnicompartmental knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID35635590
OpenAlexW4281648286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.