ArticleHeart and vessels2022
Predictivity of acute kidney injury risk scores for late kidney injury in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in NSTEMI Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Lanthanum hydroxide protects kidney through gut microbiota in a rat model of chronic kidney disease.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Late rather than acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been recently recognized as a predictor of future adverse events in patient with coronary artery disease. The risk-predicting models for acute kidney injury reported by Mehran et al., Bartholomew et al., and Tsai et al. were derived from a large cohort and externally validated, although the applicability of these models for predicting late kidney injury is unknown. A total of 327 patients undergoing elective PCI procedures were included. We calculated the three scores and tested their diagnostic ability for predicting late kidney injury (> 6 months after PCI), defined as an increase in creatinine levels ≥ 0.3 mg/dl or ≥ 50% from baseline. During the median follow-up period of 28 months, 27 (8.3%) patients had late kidney injury. All three scores significantly predicted late kidney injury, among which the score by Tsai et al. had a better diagnostic ability (area under the curve 0.83, best cut-off value 14, p < 0.001). With the best cut-off value, patients with Tsai score ≥ 14 had a significantly higher rate of late kidney injury than their counterpart (27.4% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, established risk scores for acute kidney injury may be useful for predicting late kidney injury after PCI in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.