Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35635513›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2022

Prescribing as affective clinical practice: Transformations in sexual health consultations through HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis.

Anthony K J Smith, Christy E Newman, Bridget Haire, Martin Holt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anthony K J SmithCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-9542
Christy E NewmanCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Bridget HaireKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Martin HoltCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2586-8274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New medicines can transform routines and priorities in clinical practice, but how do clinicians think and feel about these changes, and how does it affect their work? In Australia, the HIV prevention regimen pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been rapidly rolled out, transforming the sexual cultures and practices of users, but less attention has been given to the ways PrEP has reconfigured clinical practice. This paper draws on 28 qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted between 2019 and 2020 with PrEP-providing doctors and nurses in Australia to consider how they have affectively engaged with PrEP and put it into practice. Through a reflexive thematic analysis, we explore how clinicians adapted to PrEP, how the field of HIV prevention has been transformed, and how these developments have changed how clinicians approach patients. While the introduction of PrEP was initially received with uncertainty and shock, clinicians described PrEP as enjoyable to prescribe, and better aligned with the moral duties of sexual health consultations than existing HIV prevention strategies like condoms. Through approaching clinical work as an 'affective practice', we argue for attending not only to how new interventions change expectations and practices, but also how these changes are felt and valued by clinicians.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAnti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual HealthHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleReferral and ConsultationSexual BehaviorAnti-HIV AgentsAustraliacondomsgay menhealth care providerHIV preventionmoral workqualitative

Identifiers

PMID35635513
PMCPMC9546439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.