Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35635437›Full record

Observational studyDeutsches Arzteblatt international2022

The Interdisciplinary Diagnosis of Rare Diseases.

Franziska Rillig, Annette Grüters, Christoph Schramm, Heiko Krude

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Achalasia: Physician Practices and Knowledge in Türkiye.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Rare disease genomics and precision medicine.Genomics & informatics · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Franziska RilligMartin Zeitz Center for Rare Diseases, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institute for Experimental Pediatric Endocrinology, Charité-Berlin University of Medicine; Berlin Center for Rare Diseases (BCSE), Charité-Berlin University of Medicine, 13353 Berlin.
Annette Grüters
Christoph Schramm
Heiko Krude

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with rare diseases often undergo a diagnostic odyssey that can last many years until the diagnosis is definitively established. To improve the diagnosis and treatment of these patients, the German National Task Force for Patients With Rare Diseases (Nationales Aktionsbündnis für Menschen mit Seltenen Erkrankungen, NAMSE) has recommended the creation of Rare Disease Centers (RDCs).

methodsAs part of the joint Translate-NAMSE project, sponsored by the G-BA Innovation Fund (G-BA, German Federal Joint Committee), we investigated the performance of RDCs in establishing the diagnosis of patients suspected to have a rare disease. The results of interdisciplinary case conferences and of exome diagnostic tests were analyzed in a prospective, multicenter observational study.

resultsA total of 5652 patients (of whom 3619 were under 18 years old, and 2033 were at least 18 years old) from 10 RDCs who did not yet have a definitive diagnosis of a rare disease were included in the study. On average, those who were under 18 years old had been symptomatic for 4.5 years without receiving a diagnosis in a standard care setting; the analogous figure for adult patients was 8.2 years. Over the course of this project (2017-2021), 1682 patients (30%) received a definitive diagnosis. 193 had a common disease, 88 had a psychosomatic disease (only in patients who were at least 18 years old), and 1401 had a rare disease. 14 850 case conferences were conducted. 1599 exome analyses led to 506 definitive genetic diagnoses (32%).

conclusionA diagnostic evaluation with the aid of interdisciplinary case conferences and the opportunity for exome analysis can be of benefit to people with rare diseases who have not received a definitive diagnosis in a standard care setting. Further improvement of the diagnosis rate can come from whole-genome analysis and from the introduction of an international registry.

Indexed as

Rare DiseasesAdolescentAdultExome SequencingHumansProspective StudiesRegistries

Identifiers

PMID35635437
PMCPMC9664985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.