ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2022
T-stage downstaging of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is not associated with reduced recurrence after adjusting for tumour characteristics.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of clinical and pathological prognostic factors of survival in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2025Article
- T-stage downstaging of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is not associated with reduced recurrence after adjusting for tumour characteristics.Journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPrior studies examining prognostic outcomes of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas achieving a complete pathological response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) did not adjust for adverse prognostic factors in multivariate analyses and account for magnetic resonance imaging tumour staging inaccuracy pre-nCRT. We aimed to clarify prognostic outcomes in mT3 rectal adenocarcinomas with ypT-downstaging post-nCRT in robust adjusted analyses.
methodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively-collected clinical data from 528 mT3 rectal adenocarcinomas ≤12 cm from the anal verge, any N-stage, no metastases, post-nCRT following total mesorectal excision (TME). Recurrence outcomes (local and distant combined) of tumours with complete ypT-downstaging (ypT0) post-nCRT before TME compared with no ypT-downstaging (≥ypT3) were examined using multivariate Cox regression, adjusting for confounders and accounting for pre-nCRT mT3-staging inaccuracy using bootstrapping.
resultsComplete ypT-downstaging was achieved in of 17.6% tumours and correlated strongly with complete pathological response. Complete ypT-downstaging was not associated with reduced recurrence hazards compared with no ypT-downstaging (hazard ratio = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-1.56; p = 0.30). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and ypN+ve increased recurrence hazards by 1.8-fold (95% CI: 1.10-2.79; p = 0.02) and 2.3-fold (95% CI: 1.48-3.54; p = 0.0002), respectively.
conclusionComplete ypT-downstaging was not associated with reduced recurrence after adjusting for confounders and accounting for mT3-staging inaccuracy, even in the absence of adverse prognostic factors (ypN+, LVI).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.