Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35635093›Full record

Observational studyEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2022

Prospective, multicentre observational study of point-of-care ultrasound practice in emergency departments across Australia and New Zealand: The POCUS-ED Registry.

Christopher Partyka, Scott Flannagan, Genevieve Carbonatto, Alexander Buttfield, Stuart Watkins, Scott Bomann, Hatem Alkhouri, Paul M Middleton, POCUS-ED Registry Group

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Point-of-care ultrasound competency of doctors working in Cape Town emergency departments.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The utilisation of emergency point-of-care ultrasound in a tertiary hospital emergency department in East London, South Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher PartykaEmergency Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7142-4386
Scott FlannaganEmergency Department, Maitland Hospital, Maitland, New South Wales, Australia.
Genevieve CarbonattoEmergency Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Alexander ButtfieldEmergency Department, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stuart WatkinsEmergency Department, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0170-3467
Scott BomannDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand.
Hatem AlkhouriEmergency Care Institute, Agency for Clinical Innovation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5569-704X
Paul M MiddletonSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0760-1098
POCUS-ED Registry Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe present study aimed to describe the characteristics, performance, accuracy and significance of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use in the ED, by utilising an expanded version of the ACEM-mandated special skills placement (SSP) logbook, to develop a novel clinical quality registry.

methodsA prospective, observational study was performed across EDs in Australia and New Zealand over a 12-month period. Trainees undertaking ACEM-approved ultrasound (US) SSPs recorded all US scan interpretations and follow-up imaging reports in an online database.

resultsIn total, 2647 USs were recorded by 26 special skills trainees across 10 EDs in Australia or New Zealand; of these 2356 scans (89%) were clinically indicated. Overall, 2493 scans (94%) were used for diagnostic assessment, of which 1147 (43%) had abnormal findings. Basic echocardiography, extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma and right upper quadrant scans were the most commonly used modalities. There were 134 US-guided procedures logged in the registry. Approximately 36% of scans were reported to alter the original provisional diagnosis, whereas in another 37% of cases, POCUS was thought to confirm the original clinical suspicion. The majority of scans (76.5%) entered into the registry were physically reviewed by the SSP supervisor.

conclusionsThis multicentred registry provides a detailed description of the current utilisation of POCUS within special skills US placements across EDs in Australia and New Zealand. This data should inform clinical leaders in emergency US to improve both POCUS education and governance around this important tool.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPoint-of-Care SystemsHumansNew ZealandProspective StudiesRegistriesUltrasonographyemergency ultrasoundgovernancepoint-of-care ultrasoundquality assuranceregistry

Identifiers

PMID35635093
PMCPMC9796065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.