Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35635018›Full record

SynthesisPalliative medicine2022

How effective is virtual reality technology in palliative care? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jiping Mo, Victoria Vickerstaff, Ollie Minton, Simon Tavabie, Mark Taubert, Patrick Stone, Nicola White

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Palliative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06328751 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Study With Cancer Patients at the CECON Foundation's Pain Therapy and Palliative Care Service: Meditation With Immersive Virtual Reality for Pain Relief

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmily Santos MontarroyosRan2024 to 2027Enrolled129ConditionsCancer Pain, Quality of Life, Palliative MedicineArmsCase group, Active control group, Passive control group
NCT07567391 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Reality Nature Therapy for Palliative Patients and Caregivers in Saudi Arabia: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Support Quality of Life and Cultural Adaptation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BishaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsVirtual Reality, Quality of Life, Palliative Care, CaregiversArmsImmersive Nature VR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Application of virtual reality for supportive care in cancer patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Virtual reality technology for pain management in advanced cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiping MoUCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Victoria VickerstaffMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Ollie MintonSussex Cancer Centre University Hospitals, Sussex, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4258-8995
Simon TavabieSt Joseph's Hospice, Hackney, UK.
Mark TaubertPalliative Medicine, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.
Patrick StoneMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Nicola WhiteMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7438-0072

Funding

Department of HealthMarie Curie MCCC-FCH-18-U
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of virtual reality for people living with a terminal illness is unclear.

aimTo determine the feasibility and effectiveness of virtual reality use within a palliative care setting.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. PROSPERO (CRD42021240395). DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, AMED, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2021. Search terms included 'virtual reality' and 'palliative care'. Eligibility: (1) adult (>18 years old) with a terminal illness (2) at least one virtual reality session and (3) feasibility data and/or at least one patient outcome reported. The ROB-2 and ROBINS tools assessed risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) tool assessed the quality of the evidence. Standardised mean differences (Hedges's

resultsEight studies were included, of which five were in the meta-analysis. All studies had at least some concern for risk of bias. Virtual reality statistically significantly improved pain (

conclusionsVirtual reality in palliative care is feasible and acceptable. However, limited sample sizes and very low-quality studies mean that the efficacy of virtual reality needs further research.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingPalliative CareAdolescentHumansTechnologyelectronicsmedicalPalliative caretechnologyvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35635018
PMCPMC9248003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.