ArticleTurkish journal of urology2022
Calcified Peyronie's Disease Frequency on Computed Tomography.
Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current and Future Directions of Technology in Assessment of Peyronie's Disease.Current urology reports · 2024Review
- The prevalence and topographic distribution of penile calcification in a large cohort: a retrospective cross-sectional study.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- A pictorial review of scrotal and penile pathology on computed tomography.Emergency radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn computed tomography examinations performed for various reasons, calcified Peyronie's dis-ease can be incidentally detected. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the frequency of calcified Peyronie'sdisease incidentally detected in patients with abdominal computed tomography. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe images of male patients undergoing abdominal computed tomography betweenJanuary 2019 and January 2020 were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of calcified Peyronie's dis-ease. 1968 patients remained after subtracting computed tomography scans for insufficient evaluation of the penis, evaluated for the presence of calcified Peyronie's disease by two radiologists based on consensus. Thelocalization, side, and the number of plaques were recorded.
resultsThe computed tomography examination of 1968 patients revealed calcified Peyronie's disease in 130 (6.6%) patients. Peyronie's disease was bilateral in 73 patients (56.1%), and unilateral in 57 (43.9%). A single plaque was observed in 44 (33.9%) patients, and multiple plaques in 86 (66.1%). The plaques werelocated in the middle portion of the penis in 98, proximal penis in 92, and distal penis in 31 cases.
conclusionCalcified Peyronie's disease is incidentally detected on computed tomography examinations at a rate not rare. Peyronie's disease tends to be multiple, bilateral, and localized in the middle portion of thepenis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.