ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022
Testing for fitness epistasis in a transplant experiment identifies a candidate adaptive locus in
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural genomic variation and migratory behavior in a wild songbird.Evolution letters · 2023Article
- Complex evolutionary processes maintain an ancient chromosomal inversion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Disruptive selection and the evolution of discrete color morphs inScience advances · 2023Article
- Genetic basis of speciation and adaptation: from loci to causative mutations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Testing for fitness epistasis in a transplant experiment identifies a candidate adaptive locus inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying the genetic basis of adaptation is a central goal of evolutionary biology. However, identifying genes and mutations affecting fitness remains challenging because a large number of traits and variants can influence fitness. Selected phenotypes can also be difficult to know
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.