Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35634780›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2022

Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein-binding peptides.

Sebastian Swanson, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Gevorg Grigoryan, Amy E Keating

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. De novo design of stable proteins that efficaciously inhibit oncogenic G proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  5. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein-binding peptides.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian SwansonDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0114-0051
Venkatesh SivaramanDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6965-3961
Gevorg GrigoryanDepartment of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4645-7666
Amy E KeatingDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4074-8980
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USDartmouth College · US

Funding

Computational design of novel protein binders based on structure mining and learning from dataR01GM132117 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GRIGORYAN, GEVORG, KEATING, AMY E · 2020 to 2023
$1.5M
National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01GM132117NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in protein engineering, the de novo design of small proteins or peptides that bind to a desired target remains a difficult task. Most computational methods search for binder structures in a library of candidate scaffolds, which can lead to designs with poor target complementarity and low success rates. Instead of choosing from pre-defined scaffolds, we propose that custom peptide structures can be constructed to complement a target surface. Our method mines tertiary motifs (TERMs) from known structures to identify surface-complementing fragments or "seeds." We combine seeds that satisfy geometric overlap criteria to generate peptide backbones and score the backbones to identify the most likely binding structures. We found that TERM-based seeds can describe known binding structures with high resolution: the vast majority of peptide binders from 486 peptide-protein complexes can be covered by seeds generated from single-chain structures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that known peptide structures can be reconstructed with high accuracy from peptide-covering seeds. As a proof of concept, we used our method to design 100 peptide binders of TRAF6, seven of which were predicted by Rosetta to form higher-quality interfaces than a native binder. The designed peptides interact with distinct sites on TRAF6, including the native peptide-binding site. These results demonstrate that known peptide-binding structures can be constructed from TERMs in single-chain structures and suggest that TERM information can be applied to efficiently design novel target-complementing binders.

Indexed as

PeptidesTNF Receptor-Associated Factor 6Binding SitesProtein BindingProtein EngineeringPeptidesTNF Receptor-Associated Factor 6computational protein designde novo designpeptide binderpeptide structure coverageprotein interfacetertiary motifTRAF6

Identifiers

PMID35634780
PMCPMC9088223
OpenAlexW4280590826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.